Read on Twitter
@ArkansasBlog you have spent a month using ink on a story that’s based on your assumption. A month getting people riled up off off your assumptions. A month trashing a company that may or may not want to be in LR. Blog post after blog post preaching your bias to your readers.
@ArkansasBlog In that month you have missed a couple of real stories, that I’m sure your readers would have like to have known about, let me help you out because your bias is showing https://www.arkansasonline.com/news/2020/jul/29/lr-to-redirect-funds-from-park-easement-to-daisy/?news-arkansas
@ArkansasBlog or this story, again just trying to help because your bias is showing.
It’s becoming obvious that you would rather manufacture and drive a negative story than report the positives.
It’s becoming obvious that you would rather manufacture and drive a negative story than report the positives.
@ArkansasBlog Even when the story has nothing to do with the Mayor, you find away to drag him into your negativity. Like below in a story about Legislators, Tyson, and The Govenor, you still found a way to take a shot at the mayor. https://arktimes.com/arkansas-blog/2020/07/25/breaking-legislator-bucks-vested-nwa-interests-on-minority-aid-vote-but-well-they-asked-for-it
Makes us wonder why @ArkansasBlog won’t fairly, or accurately cover the stories of the Mayor of the City of Little Rock. Makes you question who will cover our news, who will tell these stories unbiasedly. Makes you question is it the stories or the blogger?
