Quote, "Also, once in a while Trump comes out with a gem that makes me wonder, this time he said “fewer tests, fewer cases”.
Correct again Mr Trump! https://cvpandemicinvestigation.com/where-the-covid19-cases-come-from-virus-isolation-myths-and-pcr-technology/?fbclid=IwAR2KNzC67Qb5y1U15Sjug4S8s7Wbbm1OaiZxbbn-bjKej3fZa-88qaHnOcY
Correct again Mr Trump! https://cvpandemicinvestigation.com/where-the-covid19-cases-come-from-virus-isolation-myths-and-pcr-technology/?fbclid=IwAR2KNzC67Qb5y1U15Sjug4S8s7Wbbm1OaiZxbbn-bjKej3fZa-88qaHnOcY
Quote, "I work in a technical industry where calibration, testing and regulation are the norm. I can think of no comparisons where the issues described here would be acceptable in terms of evidence or risk."
Quote, "Having worked with Big Pharma clients for many years, this has informed my opinion that they are unscrupulous operators willing to defend a profitable lie to the hilt, even after prosecution."
https://cvpandemicinvestigation.com/where-the-covid19-cases-come-from-virus-isolation-myths-and-pcr-technology/?fbclid=IwAR2KNzC67Qb5y1U15Sjug4S8s7Wbbm1OaiZxbbn-bjKej3fZa-88qaHnOcY
https://cvpandemicinvestigation.com/where-the-covid19-cases-come-from-virus-isolation-myths-and-pcr-technology/?fbclid=IwAR2KNzC67Qb5y1U15Sjug4S8s7Wbbm1OaiZxbbn-bjKej3fZa-88qaHnOcY
Quote, "I made the claim that COVID19 has yet to be confirmed as the disease from an isolated
SARS-CoV-2 virus, some replies referenced recent publications as evidence. [1][2][3][4][5]"
SARS-CoV-2 virus, some replies referenced recent publications as evidence. [1][2][3][4][5]"
Quote from the link in the text image https://cvpandemicinvestigation.com/where-the-covid19-cases-come-from-virus-isolation-myths-and-pcr-technology/?fbclid=IwAR2KNzC67Qb5y1U15Sjug4S8s7Wbbm1OaiZxbbn-bjKej3fZa-88qaHnOcY
Quote, "References to any isolation of SARS-CoV-2 invariably depend on PCR technology and yet its inventor, Dr. Kary Mullis states why this is not a suitable application."
Quote, "PCR is a manufacturing process and not a diagnostic tool. The PCR test does not isolate, identify or even detect any particular virus."
Quote,"It [the PCR test] uses multiple cycles of PCR with the boundary between positive and negative remaining arbitrary, but usually interpreted as infected and uninfected." https://cvpandemicinvestigation.com/where-the-covid19-cases-come-from-virus-isolation-myths-and-pcr-technology/?fbclid=IwAR2KNzC67Qb5y1U15Sjug4S8s7Wbbm1OaiZxbbn-bjKej3fZa-88qaHnOcY
Quote, "All test equipment used in the referenced studies is described by the manufacturers as “For Research Use Only. Not for use in diagnostic procedures”."
https://cvpandemicinvestigation.com/where-the-covid19-cases-come-from-virus-isolation-myths-and-pcr-technology/?fbclid=IwAR2KNzC67Qb5y1U15Sjug4S8s7Wbbm1OaiZxbbn-bjKej3fZa-88qaHnOcY
https://cvpandemicinvestigation.com/where-the-covid19-cases-come-from-virus-isolation-myths-and-pcr-technology/?fbclid=IwAR2KNzC67Qb5y1U15Sjug4S8s7Wbbm1OaiZxbbn-bjKej3fZa-88qaHnOcY
Qu: It also includes the following caution “Clinical correlation with patient history and other diagnostic information is necessary to determine patient infection status."...
Qu: ...""Positive results do not rule out bacterial infection or co-infection with other viruses. The agent detected may not be the definite cause of disease”."
"Use of such tests for clinical diagnostic purposes may mislead healthcare providers & cause serious adverse health consequences to patients, who are not aware that they are being diagnosed with or treated based on the results of tests with research or investigational products."
Quote, "Neither the manufacturers nor the FDA are willing to state that PCR testing is safe or effective for diagnosis."
https://cvpandemicinvestigation.com/where-the-covid19-cases-come-from-virus-isolation-myths-and-pcr-technology/?fbclid=IwAR2KNzC67Qb5y1U15Sjug4S8s7Wbbm1OaiZxbbn-bjKej3fZa-88qaHnOcY
https://cvpandemicinvestigation.com/where-the-covid19-cases-come-from-virus-isolation-myths-and-pcr-technology/?fbclid=IwAR2KNzC67Qb5y1U15Sjug4S8s7Wbbm1OaiZxbbn-bjKej3fZa-88qaHnOcY
Quote, “No test gives a 100% accurate result; tests need to be evaluated to determine their sensitivity and specificity, ideally by comparison with a “gold standard.” The lack of such a clear-cut “gold-standard” for COVID19 testing makes evaluation of test accuracy challenging.”
Quote, "The test equipment comes with certification to support its accuracy, but from what I can see this only certifies that it behaves as advertised, the disclaimers still stand and nobody will guarantee PCR as safe for diagnosis."
Quote, "A review of PCR tests approved under Emergency Use Authorisation (EUA) by the FDA showed that one test each recommended that positive be considered less than 30, 31, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39 cycles, 12 recommended less than 40, and one each recommended 43 and 45."
Quote, "Two different test setups in two different labs, that both use the PCR cycle number 35 as a cutoff, may actually have the cutoff between negative and positive at wildly different places [12]." https://cvpandemicinvestigation.com/where-the-covid19-cases-come-from-virus-isolation-myths-and-pcr-technology/?fbclid=IwAR2KNzC67Qb5y1U15Sjug4S8s7Wbbm1OaiZxbbn-bjKej3fZa-88qaHnOcY
Quote" On this subject, Mullis stated
“If you have to go more than 40 cycles to amplify a single-copy gene, there is something seriously wrong with your PCR” [17] https://cvpandemicinvestigation.com/where-the-covid19-cases-come-from-virus-isolation-myths-and-pcr-technology/?fbclid=IwAR2KNzC67Qb5y1U15Sjug4S8s7Wbbm1OaiZxbbn-bjKej3fZa-88qaHnOcY
“If you have to go more than 40 cycles to amplify a single-copy gene, there is something seriously wrong with your PCR” [17] https://cvpandemicinvestigation.com/where-the-covid19-cases-come-from-virus-isolation-myths-and-pcr-technology/?fbclid=IwAR2KNzC67Qb5y1U15Sjug4S8s7Wbbm1OaiZxbbn-bjKej3fZa-88qaHnOcY
"Different hospitals and facilities use different cut off sensitivity standards for the test. If you cut off at 20 then everybody tested will be negative, if you cut off at 50 you might have everybody positive."
Quote, "Some tests look for only one segment, so it must be present for a positive. Other tests that look for two segments are split between those that require both to be present and those that require either one for a positive." https://cvpandemicinvestigation.com/where-the-covid19-cases-come-from-virus-isolation-myths-and-pcr-technology/?fbclid=IwAR2KNzC67Qb5y1U15Sjug4S8s7Wbbm1OaiZxbbn-bjKej3fZa-88qaHnOcY
Quote, "Some tests look for three segments but only require any two to be present, while one test insisted on all three.
Under EUA, the FDA now pronounces the population infected or uninfected using equipment it would have otherwise refused to approve."
Under EUA, the FDA now pronounces the population infected or uninfected using equipment it would have otherwise refused to approve."
Quote, "In the UK, the NHS suggested that test labs perform a non-specific in-house “validation” of test kits. [13]"
https://cvpandemicinvestigation.com/where-the-covid19-cases-come-from-virus-isolation-myths-and-pcr-technology/?fbclid=IwAR2KNzC67Qb5y1U15Sjug4S8s7Wbbm1OaiZxbbn-bjKej3fZa-88qaHnOcY
Ref 13: 16th March, https://www.england.nhs.uk/coronavirus/wp-content/uploads/sites/52/2020/03/guidance-and-sop-covid-19-virus-testing-in-nhs-laboratories-v1.pdf
https://cvpandemicinvestigation.com/where-the-covid19-cases-come-from-virus-isolation-myths-and-pcr-technology/?fbclid=IwAR2KNzC67Qb5y1U15Sjug4S8s7Wbbm1OaiZxbbn-bjKej3fZa-88qaHnOcY
Ref 13: 16th March, https://www.england.nhs.uk/coronavirus/wp-content/uploads/sites/52/2020/03/guidance-and-sop-covid-19-virus-testing-in-nhs-laboratories-v1.pdf
Reference [16] in the article is https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download
https://cvpandemicinvestigation.com/where-the-covid19-cases-come-from-virus-isolation-myths-and-pcr-technology/?fbclid=IwAR2KNzC67Qb5y1U15Sjug4S8s7Wbbm1OaiZxbbn-bjKej3fZa-88qaHnOcY
https://cvpandemicinvestigation.com/where-the-covid19-cases-come-from-virus-isolation-myths-and-pcr-technology/?fbclid=IwAR2KNzC67Qb5y1U15Sjug4S8s7Wbbm1OaiZxbbn-bjKej3fZa-88qaHnOcY
Quote, "Published Data
Out of the five journal papers referenced, three use a single patient for analysis and only one has a control group."
https://cvpandemicinvestigation.com/where-the-covid19-cases-come-from-virus-isolation-myths-and-pcr-technology/?fbclid=IwAR2KNzC67Qb5y1U15Sjug4S8s7Wbbm1OaiZxbbn-bjKej3fZa-88qaHnOcY
Out of the five journal papers referenced, three use a single patient for analysis and only one has a control group."
https://cvpandemicinvestigation.com/where-the-covid19-cases-come-from-virus-isolation-myths-and-pcr-technology/?fbclid=IwAR2KNzC67Qb5y1U15Sjug4S8s7Wbbm1OaiZxbbn-bjKej3fZa-88qaHnOcY
Quote, 'The authors of this paper were contacted by researchers Engelbrecht and Demeter who asked if the Electron Microscope pictures show purified viruses. A reply from author Wenjie Tan states “We show an image of sedimented virus particles, not purified ones”[18]'
Quote, '“We could not estimate the degree of purification because we do not purify and concentrate the virus cultured in cells” [18].'
https://cvpandemicinvestigation.com/where-the-covid19-cases-come-from-virus-isolation-myths-and-pcr-technology/?fbclid=IwAR2KNzC67Qb5y1U15Sjug4S8s7Wbbm1OaiZxbbn-bjKej3fZa-88qaHnOcY
https://cvpandemicinvestigation.com/where-the-covid19-cases-come-from-virus-isolation-myths-and-pcr-technology/?fbclid=IwAR2KNzC67Qb5y1U15Sjug4S8s7Wbbm1OaiZxbbn-bjKej3fZa-88qaHnOcY
Quote, "Other replies to this question from similar papers included “It is not purified virus.” and “We did not obtain an electron micrograph showing the degree of purification” [18]"
The Australian study includes, “One unresolved question is whether patients who are clinically stable and deemed fit to be discharged from hospital but have PCR-detectable virus are infectious, or whether this indicates only the persistence of non-infectious, residual viral RNA.”
Quote, 'No steps appear to have been taken to prove that a healthy population does not also have the residual viral RNA in question. A study published in The Lancet states “…we did not perform tests for detecting infectious virus in blood”. [14]'
https://cvpandemicinvestigation.com/where-the-covid19-cases-come-from-virus-isolation-myths-and-pcr-technology/?fbclid=IwAR2KNzC67Qb5y1U15Sjug4S8s7Wbbm1OaiZxbbn-bjKej3fZa-88qaHnOcY
https://cvpandemicinvestigation.com/where-the-covid19-cases-come-from-virus-isolation-myths-and-pcr-technology/?fbclid=IwAR2KNzC67Qb5y1U15Sjug4S8s7Wbbm1OaiZxbbn-bjKej3fZa-88qaHnOcY
Quote, 'All of the studies fail to screen out the exact contamination and technical noise critics claim is being mistaken for a virus and the authors admit this freely.' https://cvpandemicinvestigation.com/where-the-covid19-cases-come-from-virus-isolation-myths-and-pcr-technology/?fbclid=IwAR2KNzC67Qb5y1U15Sjug4S8s7Wbbm1OaiZxbbn-bjKej3fZa-88qaHnOcY
Quote, 'Each paper depends on PCR testing methods for primary diagnosis and all use different target portions and cutoff limits while the phrase “in accordance with manufacturer instructions” is omnipresent.'
Quote, 'Given that all equipment used falls short of FDA approval, remaining in the category of 'not for diagnostic use' this seems incongruous from every angle.' https://cvpandemicinvestigation.com/where-the-covid19-cases-come-from-virus-isolation-myths-and-pcr-technology/?fbclid=IwAR2KNzC67Qb5y1U15Sjug4S8s7Wbbm1OaiZxbbn-bjKej3fZa-88qaHnOcY
Quote: PCR Market Value
The PCR market size is projected to be $8.5 billion by 2026 and the industry is positioning itself to exploit emerging pandemics by selling tests to governments. [15]
The PCR market size is projected to be $8.5 billion by 2026 and the industry is positioning itself to exploit emerging pandemics by selling tests to governments. [15]
'Should the technology be proved to be the unreliable fraud that critics claim then I do not expect the PCR industry or media to ever admit this.' https://tinyurl.com/y2xjonqz
'While it remains unregulated this sector has the ability to generate a pandemic out of nothing or cover one up. It can produce any data you like & every part of the process during the COVID19 scare has been arbitrary, unregulated and without consequence.' https://tinyurl.com/y2xjonqz
Quote, 'COVID19 testing relies on a process described as unfit for purpose by the inventor. The risks from contamination and lack of screening coupled with arbitrary methods of diagnosis are overlooked in a unified group-think from the industry.'
Quote, 'Even putting those concerns aside, had there been any standards in place then the global infection data would still be far more robust than its current junk status.' https://cvpandemicinvestigation.com/where-the-covid19-cases-come-from-virus-isolation-myths-and-pcr-technology/?fbclid=IwAR2KNzC67Qb5y1U15Sjug4S8s7Wbbm1OaiZxbbn-bjKej3fZa-88qaHnOcY
Quote, 'We have no way of knowing the true number of infections because the entire data set is irrevocably corrupted.' https://tinyurl.com/y2xjonqz
"One fact to remember is that when you test an uninfected population using PCR technology it only produces false positives."
https://tinyurl.com/y2xjonqz
https://tinyurl.com/y2xjonqz
'The amount of false positives depends on the myriad of erratic variables described above and interpreting this data as a pandemic or seasonal flu then swiftly departs from any science to become a matter of opinion.'
https://tinyurl.com/y2xjonqz
https://tinyurl.com/y2xjonqz