Okay, so I looked to try to find evidence that hydroxychloriquine DOESNT work.

I found this, which is an article, not a study, but it lays out the situation well.

Story: months ago, hydroxychloriquine looked promising. Studies began.

Then Trump said something good about it. 1/
Soon after, the Lancet (same journal that said vaccines caused autism) ran an article saying hydroxychloroquine increased deaths in the hospital due to cardiac complications.

THEN—doctors read the study, and found many problems with it. Statistics that didnt add up, etc.
They tried to get the researchers to back up their findings with data, but they refused, and they were using a weird data processing company to begin with, so...the study was retracted.

AGAIN—the ONE study that said hydroxychloroquine was danger was retracted.

Then, the WHO
Decided to cancel it’s study arm that was looking at hydroxychloroquine.

THEN, the lead researcher in the UK ALSO cancelled his study on hydroxychloroquine.

(You think none of this had anything to do with Trump? Are you even paying attention?)

Anyway, that was back in June.
At the start of July, new studies started coming out showing that hydroxychloroquine was
1. Safe
2. Effective.

These studies came out in India, France, and the US. One was done by the Henry Ford foundation.

ALL OF THEM show positive results.

Now, yeah—the news can poke holes
One can poke holes in ANY research study.

But the fact remains that the ONE study showing hydroxychloroquive was dangerous was retreated due to faulty science.

There are no studies I’m finding that show it doesnt work.

Here is the article I spoke about: https://www.bmj.com/content/369/bmj.m2378.full
*retracted.
You can follow @folding_laundry.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.