Very much open to hearing more about the service to public health these front pages are providing today.
It's almost as though decisions not to name the Aspen ski couple and your track record of reporting when it comes to POC are somewhat relevant to the ethics of these editorial decisions.
This is absolutely every newsroom's "can they afford a lawyer if we publish this?" flowchart in sharp relief. Throw in skin tone and the clicks to risk ratio is irresistible.
You don't need to defend what they did to have concerns about how this is now handled.
You don't need to defend what they did to have concerns about how this is now handled.
The difference today is media outlets know they can simply provide the doxing details and leave the death threats and vigilante vibe to people sharing their articles on Facebook https://twitter.com/paulkidd/status/1288639975160836098