Read on Twitter
This is HUGE: Fauci’s NIH pulled a study of HCQ in mid June because they were unable to find more than TWETNY people who will take it in the early stagedls of being hit with Covid.
Maybe if he did less interviews and did his job instead, he would find more than 20 people. https://twitter.com/hameturgeman/status/1288239939512082433
Maybe if he did less interviews and did his job instead, he would find more than 20 people. https://twitter.com/hameturgeman/status/1288239939512082433
Furthermore, if Big Tech did not choke off doctors who say that it DOES work especially when given early, Fauci may have found 2,000 people for his study. Instead, he pulled the study by June 20 and did more self-serving interviews instead. What a failure.
H 
E L L O O !
Fauci runs the NIAID since 1984. It could not get its act together and find more than 20 people for a study to see if HCQ works for patients who take it early enough.
Did Fauci push for candidates in interviews?
NO!
NIAID just pulled the study!
E L L O O !Fauci runs the NIAID since 1984. It could not get its act together and find more than 20 people for a study to see if HCQ works for patients who take it early enough.
Did Fauci push for candidates in interviews?
NO!
NIAID just pulled the study!
The FDA and Fauci’s NIAID said mid-June that tests on HCQ did not show benefits for hospitalized patients.
The question is if it helps when given early but NIAID did not finish its study on this.
FDA 6/15/20: https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-cautions-against-use-hydroxychloroquine-or-chloroquine-covid-19-outside-hospital-setting-or
NIAID 6/20/20 http://www.niaid.nih.gov/news-events/bulletin-nih-clinical-trial-evaluating-hydroxychloroquine-and-azithromycin-covid-19
The question is if it helps when given early but NIAID did not finish its study on this.
FDA 6/15/20: https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-cautions-against-use-hydroxychloroquine-or-chloroquine-covid-19-outside-hospital-setting-or
NIAID 6/20/20 http://www.niaid.nih.gov/news-events/bulletin-nih-clinical-trial-evaluating-hydroxychloroquine-and-azithromycin-covid-19
The FDA said 6/15 they are revoking the use of HCQ in hospitals because studies show lack of benefits so it does not meet the legal threshold to permit its use.
Doctors claim it helps if given early.
FDA’s revocation for hospital use doesn’t address this. So Y censor people?
Doctors claim it helps if given early.
FDA’s revocation for hospital use doesn’t address this. So Y censor people?
Big Tech is shutting down doctors, and Corporate Media are sandbagging those doctors for having an opinion about HCQ that the FDA and Fauci’s NIAID did not say otherwise.
How many Journos/Big Tech staffers even know of the above details that I gave you? Maybe 1 of 100!
How many Journos/Big Tech staffers even know of the above details that I gave you? Maybe 1 of 100!
The FDA report on issues with HCQ when used in hospital:
- Lists 331 cases but it does not say how many used it without an issue.
- Dates late 2019 through early May. Why no new studies the last 10 weeks?
- Only 29.3% of the 331 cases are in the US.
- Most cases that had
- Lists 331 cases but it does not say how many used it without an issue.
- Dates late 2019 through early May. Why no new studies the last 10 weeks?
- Only 29.3% of the 331 cases are in the US.
- Most cases that had
a bad reaction also used other medications (maybe the mix was bad.).
- The report did not say if those side effects are also here when using HCQ for Malaria.
- NO WORD if there were adverse reactions when given for people in the pre-hospital stage.
- Fauci started a study on
- The report did not say if those side effects are also here when using HCQ for Malaria.
- NO WORD if there were adverse reactions when given for people in the pre-hospital stage.
- Fauci started a study on
whether it helps pre-hospital state but stopped the study.
It’s fascinating how few people in Big Tech, Media, Politics or Trump staff at the WH seem to gave read the short FDA and NIAID statements above, or the 15 page report below.
Read: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/nda/2020/OSE%20Review_Hydroxychloroquine-Cholorquine%20-%2019May2020_Redacted.pdf
It’s fascinating how few people in Big Tech, Media, Politics or Trump staff at the WH seem to gave read the short FDA and NIAID statements above, or the 15 page report below.
Read: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/nda/2020/OSE%20Review_Hydroxychloroquine-Cholorquine%20-%2019May2020_Redacted.pdf
Key Points:
1) Censoring content that is not inline with current US medical policy means removing content that may be the accurate policy in months. Fauci and @Surgeon_General were against masks in March-April. If you said it helped, censored. Now the policy is masks DO work!
1) Censoring content that is not inline with current US medical policy means removing content that may be the accurate policy in months. Fauci and @Surgeon_General were against masks in March-April. If you said it helped, censored. Now the policy is masks DO work!
2) Items are removed for allegedly being against medical policy when this not the case. As shown above, the main FDA issue with HCQ is if given at the hospital stage. But the debate is if it helps when given early. Fauci’s NIAID started a study on it but did not complete it.
Key Point 3 on HCQ Censoring: Months ago, The Lancet ran a study against HCQ. The public poked holes in it via Twitter etc. Lancet contacted the scientists who could not get it approvingly peer reviewed and it was pulled. Point? Open debate led to the debunking of a flawed study!
Unlike @ScottGottliebMD who is a board member at vaccine-producing @pfizer, I am not invested in any outcome — except for the outcome of letting issues be debated here; certainly by doctors. However, Twitter’s new policy is that posting a “wrong” link (of doctors making
claims that are not inline with US policy or what Twitter thinks is not inline), can get you suspened.
