Thread
I usually don't waste time on useless things like bollywood still felt like explaining some ppl that comparison between a businessman's son taking over and actor's son taking over can't be compared.

Primary defence of some folks is: biz ppl do it so wats the issue with us
1. Businesses work in entirely different context. They are highly regulated. Their products are certified. Their businesses are audited. There are multiple laws that are applicable even to owners and/or their children. Cos like RIL will have an independent director etc.
2. Do you see such checks and balances when a film (product of filmmaker) is out? Who audits? Who certifies? Is there any independent regulator?

For a businessman there is Competition law. Cartelization is not allowed.

For films? Nothing. Control. Abuse of dominant position.
3. If the son of producer is in the film then it's not even a related party transactions there. It's like "bete ko launch Kiya"

In a listed entity, try to sell a single goods or service to your own co
1. Arm's length pricing
2. Transfer pricing etc etc are applicable.
The point is: both are very different. Can't be compared. If you want to compare then also demand that all the laws that are applicable to businesses be applicable to film industry as well.

Pay minimum wages. Have working hours. Show source of funds. Expenses. File balance sheet
Have you started shitting already Bollywood fellas?

So watch what you say. Baaki, personally I feel Telugu and other south films are much better than these idea Chor category folks at fillum city

We should start ignoring them asap and save ourselves. Good night.
You can follow @muglikar_.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.