I am a computer programmer. I have worked in a dozen different organisations over the past 20 years, including many banks.
I have never been involved with clients of those organisations, or with activities to do with expanding the organisations activities. I’ve never been in+
I have never been involved with clients of those organisations, or with activities to do with expanding the organisations activities. I’ve never been in+
positions that give me privileged access to knowledge about market changing events, etc.
Nevertheless, I’ve had to do interminable training in each of those organisations so that I know my responsibilities related to insider trading, market manipulation, the receipt+
Nevertheless, I’ve had to do interminable training in each of those organisations so that I know my responsibilities related to insider trading, market manipulation, the receipt+
& giving of gifts that might be construed as bribery to receive a favourable outcome, & a whole bunch of stuff that I would *never* have had the opportunity to take part in.
How is it then, that MPs who are in the perfect position to do all of those things, not only seem+
How is it then, that MPs who are in the perfect position to do all of those things, not only seem+
unaware of the issues, but actually carry out these things in plain sight as if it’s a normal part of parliamentary business?
The corruption is not just present.
It’s nakedly institutionalised.
WTAF?
The corruption is not just present.
It’s nakedly institutionalised.
WTAF?
Correction. In the first tweet of this thread I said "I have never been involved ... with activities to do with expanding the organisations activities". That is not true. What I meant was that I have never been involved in activities to do with expanding the organisation's+
activities that would put me in a situation in which bribery or other kinds of corruption would be possible. It is of course the nature of the work I did in many of those organisations to help them to expand their business activities.