Read on Twitter
This seems like an overstatement. There are no provisions in the decree that require particular levels of funding. And the decree calls for an assessment of BPD mental health responses & commands that BPD “establish a policy for least police-involved response” to crises. https://twitter.com/justin_fenton/status/1286302055460724736
He may be conflating “abolish” with “defunding” and may not have a clear sense of how aspects of defunding proposals may be quite consistent w/elements of the decree. Yes the City is bound to pay for the training & reforms reqd by the decree, but that leaves a lot of room.
The decree does not mandate the size of the force. Nor does it cover school police (and there is an active & important effort by activists to change state law to remove police from schools in Maryland as part of the “defund” movement).
The provisions related to BPD interaction w/youth - which emphasizes increased reliance on counseling & community-based orgs (see paragraphs 218-221 of the decree) - appear to invite the kind of reallocation & reform that defund activists have advocated. https://www.justice.gov/opa/file/925056/download
The decree focuses on training, conduct, procedures, practices & data collection-all critical reforms whatever the size of the force & scope of duties. But it does forbid a reassessment of primary responsibility for certain interactions w/the public to other community resources.
