Read on Twitter
so like, they have people from february they can test to see if they still show antibodies right? are we not hearing about that because the answer is "they're all fine and have lots of antibodies"? it would be a reassurance at this point to know you can't catch it twice in 6mo
instead of "we don't know if you can catch it twice" give us "we are fairly certain immunity usually lasts at least 6mo"
we hear a LOT "there's no evidence that [this or that precaution] is necessary" and then months later hear "Actually it's airborne sorry lol no evidence just meant we didn't have evidence yet". i would really rather hear about what we specifically do know than what we don't
somehow it seems like all the talking points that favor "cautious re-opening" get boosted with dubious scientific merit them (like "no food transmission") so excuse me if i'm not trusting my information pipeline
