This guidance provides insight for clinical research into cannabis drugs. It does not provide guidance for non-drug products like the CBD gummies, tinctures, and vape pens that are widely available.
To clarify, any product can be a "drug" based on its intended use. If you are marketing CBD w/ medical claims, then the FDA can take the position that you're are marketing an unapproved drug. This guidance is directed to folks knowingly developing drugs from the jump
The FDA guidance 1st covers the source of cannabis for clinical research. Cannabis, as used here, is a general term that encompasses both marijuana and hemp. Hemp is not subject to the Controlled Substances Act. Marijuana is. That's important.
Hemp, on the other hand, is legal to grow, with the appropriate authorization from the USDA, an Indian Tribe, or a state department of agriculture. That opens up a lot of possibilities for studying cannabinoids such as THC and CBD if derived from hemp.
The FDA also provides insight into quality considerations for manufacturing a cannabis drugs.
Finally, and importantly, the FDA states that derivatives from cannabis with more than 0.3% delta-9 THC must comply with DEA requirements. The FDA also indicates that if the finished product will have more than .3% THC, investigators should figure that out early:
Overall this is pretty helpful for stakeholders interested in developing drugs from cannabis. However, the FDA has not addressed the more pressing issue of cannabis derivatives that are widely used in food, dietary supplements, cosmetics, and smokable products.
You can follow @dshortt90.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.