100% expected... 100% wrong.
Soros funded St Louis prosecutor Kim Garder files criminal charges against McCloskeys.

She says that "flourishing weapons at unarmed peaceful protestors" is illegal. https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/07/type-conduct-unacceptable-st-louis-update-soros-funded-st-louis-circuit-attorney-releases-statement-mccloskeys/

Gardner conveniently ignores some key facts:
The "protesters":
1. Broke into private property
2. Threatened the McCloskeys
3. Missouri castle doctrine
4. Implied in the Second Amendment is the right to use weapons as a DETERRENT.

Flashing a LEGAL WEAPON IS PROTECTED SPEECH.

2005 Missouri Revised Statutes
§ 571.030. Unlawful use of weapons
A person commits the crime of unlawful use of weapons if he or she knowingly:
(4) Exhibits, in the presence of one or more persons, any weapon... in an angry or threatening manner; https://law.justia.com/codes/missouri/2005/t38/5710000030.html

5. Subdivision...(4)...shall not apply to persons who are engaged in a lawful act of defense pursuant to section 563.031, RSMo

7. Unlawful use of weapons is a class D felony

563.031. Use of force in defense of persons. — 1. A person may, subject to the provisions of subsection 2 of this section, use physical force upon another person when and to the extent he or she reasonably believes... https://revisor.mo.gov/main/OneSection.aspx?section=563.031

such force to be necessary to defend himself or herself or a third person from what he or she reasonably believes to be the use or imminent use of unlawful force by such other person.
-END LAW

So, the McCloskeys must prove they reasonably believed they were in danger?

So they are guilty by default unless they can prove using their Second Amendment rights was justified?

Bottom line... there's no way the McCloskeys can lose this case. But we've seen that NWO prosecutors and judges do not care how long they drag things out, and who they make an example of.

It may be a long path to exoneration.