March 6, proposal to Congress for payments to whistleblowers & says it will go easy on corporations that try to comply with the law + an advisory opinion program for companies.

Same CFPB asking $ for whistleblowers seldom seeks $ for consumers.

https://financialservices.house.gov/uploadedfiles/cfpb_report_settling_for_nothing.pdf
March 22, issues interagency guidance that says companies won't be violating consumer protection laws if they work with consumers.

Good to know.
Maybe expecting the CFPB to respond to the surge in complaints in March is too much. Maybe they needed more time.

What did the CFPB do in April?
April Fools' Day, settles with payday lender Cash Store, who violated debt collection, credit reporting, and disclosure laws, engaged in egregiously misleading advertising.

Tells Cash Store to be a good company & follow the law going forward & pay consumers $286K.
April 7, re-issues interagency guidance, affirming a go-easy approach on consumer protection & fair lending supervision & enforcement.

https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_interagency-statement_loan-modifications-reporting-covid-19_2020-04.pdf
April 10, CFPB says it's waiving price disclosures from a small part of the remittance market, b/c what ppl need in a pandemic is not to know how much a money transfer will cost.

Still haven't figured out the argument for why that was even kinda responsive to COVID-19.
April 14, no appraisals or home value required until 4 months after closing during COVID. Helps speed closings, for sure, but not clear that not having any independent valuation of property is a good thing for consumers.

Last 2 banking crisises led to stricter appraisal rules.
April 16, CFPB issues a rule raising reporting limits for Home Mortgage Disclosure Act data, making it harder for the public and the government to find #fairlending violations, especially in rural and other underserved areas.
April 29, relaxes timing requirements on mortgage disclosure rules, ostensibly so ppl can get credit more quickly--but doesn't cite any evidence or complts from consumers that this is a problem.

Weirdly, separately relaxes time for lenders to provide payoff statements.
This is just March & April. But May, June, July weren't full of wins for consumers.

There's the Harbour settlement, for example.

https://twitter.com/DianeEThompson1/status/1275566590218637313

Or the announcement of a program to give corporations a pass from complying with the law. https://twitter.com/DianeEThompson1/status/1273686397401141254
And I skipped the videos & consumer ed. Ppl don't usually call @cfpb asking for consumer education. Ppl call for help with a debt collector or lender or mortgage company. Consumer education is important, but it isn't "aggressive" consumer protection.
In March & April,

16 public actions by CFPB in rulemaking, enforcement, & supervision
2 enforcement actions
0 regulatory actions that protected consumers

Some of the regulatory actions pbly didn't hurt consumers. Some were reasonable. They just didn't protect consumers.
March & April 2020

2 enforcement actions
1 supervisory bulletin rptng on consumer harm & excusing noncompliance

March & April 2017

7 enforcement actions
2 supervisory bulletins, telling companies to follow the law

2020 @cfpb isn't doing "aggressive" consumer protection.
You can follow @DianeEThompson1.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.