It's hard to feel sympathy for The Guardian as a trans person, when they commissioned a study on the efficacy of "sex change" surgeries that deliberately fudged it's interpretations of the data to achieve the desired outcome, and that article is still cited by transphobes today.
They commissioned a meta study of all available studies on the outcomes of sex reassignment surgery, which determined that because there was no double blind control groups for those studies, that there was no "robust" evidence for positive outcomes.
For those who don't know, double blind testing would be where, in testing a medicine for example, neither the person recieving the medication, nor the one administering it, know which is the actual medicine and which is the placebo. Hence double blind.
It's hard to overstated the damage The Guardian has done to the trans community, they've had a deliberately trans hostile editorial stance for as long as I can remember. But that meta study they commissioned? That was possibly the worst, most damaging thing they've done.

Fuck em
Keep in mind, this study was commissioned ahead of the 2004 Gender Recognition Act. In case you thought they just did that out of nowhere, and didn't have an agenda to hold back the human rights of trans people.
You can follow @CaseyExplosion.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.