This article frames Palantir - providers of the NHSX data store - as a disruptive *defense* contractor not a Silicon Valley unicorn. https://www.vox.com/recode/2020/7/16/21323458/palantir-ipo-hhs-protect-peter-thiel-cia-intelligence
Now why is a defense contractor working with the NHS? Something something exceptional times, but a public-health emergency isn’t actually a war, is it? Except Cummings’ fascination with military-born innovation is a known-known, eg the term “skunkworks” was invented by Lockheed.
Here’s a quote from Palantir CEO about why the additional scrutiny of going to IPO might not be worth the trouble: “you need a lot of creative, wacky people that maybe Wall Street won’t understand”. Now, what does that remind me of?
Now of course, the Palantir panopticon is concerning from a privacy, surveillance and human rights perspective. But also: what is the long-game? If it’s all part of a plan to get better dashboards and make data-driven policy it seems like a high price to pay.
Where is the scrutiny, the oversight? Or will this continue to slip through because no one wants to look anti-progress?
Of course, at a moment when the UK’s ability to count things is under significant scrutiny, this might seem like a welcome improvement, and perhaps it is, but where are the ethics boards? Where are the teams of sociologists being spun up to generate insight?
Or, to put it more eloquently: https://twitter.com/abebab/status/1281900516835041291?s=21 https://twitter.com/abebab/status/1281900516835041291
Anyway, tl;dr, I think this is a huge risk to a functioning democracy and don’t understand why more people - particularly those who’ve been part of the #AIEthics and #dataethics communities - aren’t up in arms about it.
You can follow @rachelcoldicutt.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.