Read on Twitter
Hey, if we're in a "body pos" mood, can we talk about how the patriarchy is so centered around a penis that the lowest hanging fruit. (no pun intended) is making fun of the size of a male's genitals?
Big Truck? Compensating
Don't like them? Must have a small dick. Probably can't
Big Truck? Compensating
Don't like them? Must have a small dick. Probably can't
satisfy a partner.
Confidence is referred to as big dick energy.
And the list goes on. If we're cognizant of how patriarchy looks in policing female presenting bodies, we also need to acknowledge that it reduces men to their penis as a matter of prowess, power, or lack thereof.
Confidence is referred to as big dick energy.
And the list goes on. If we're cognizant of how patriarchy looks in policing female presenting bodies, we also need to acknowledge that it reduces men to their penis as a matter of prowess, power, or lack thereof.
I get it. Big dicks are fetishized. Porn stars are jackhammers with an on-demand frosting button. We've even gone to combine that fetish with a racial one which does no service to black men (this is another topic for a different thread but still important). And now there's
the ever increasing usage of "cuck" as an insult (which that is a VALID fetish in and of itself). We've been told that smaller is less desirable and every day we're sold pills, potions, creams, pumps, and jelking seminars to make us bigger and therefore more attractive
(typically to females in terms of virility) or to establish dominance over other men. Ask anybody who's had a larger person ram into their cervix/small intestine for 40 minutes because they saw Peter North do it, that bigger is not better just because bigger. At the end of the
day all I'm trying to do it get us to think about separating what's between a dudes legs and his worth, which can hopefully allow them to relate to other people in ways irrespective of that.
