Read on Twitter
I know people like @NunbergSam lie with ease, but given he invited the target of his slander to sue him for his mendacity, I urge her to do so. I also urge any of my followers who are lawyers to represent her pro-bono, & I'll help with the evidence..../1 https://www.rawstory.com/2020/07/ex-trump-adviser-launches-attack-on-roger-stones-jury-forewoman-then-dares-her-to-sue-him/
...perhaps @NunbergSam - like so many conservatives - relies exclusively on the propaganda he sees on Hannity without bothering to check the record before launching attacks. Let me advise, Sam - before you attack people who can sue you, check the record. I will do so now.../2
...for those sick of the lying of Trumpers, this will be fun. Also, @AlexWitt - invite @NunbergSam back so he can explain his lies - or you must correct his lies, since even @MSNBC can be held liable for letting this slander be broadcast uncorrected.
Here's what he said...
Here's what he said...
...this is almost verbatim the argument Stone's lawyers made, which has been repeated ad nauseam on Hannity and Fox. But they have been very careful to couch their statements in weasel words that allow them outs on slander. Sam not only didn't, he acknowledged that his words.../3
...*if untrue* would leave him open for a slander suit. So, let's prove slander:
Start here: Judge Jackson delved into the VERY argument that @NunbergSam slavishly repeats that the forewoman lied in this publicly available, easily obtainable ruling.../4 https://int.nyt.com/data/documenthelper/6892-roger-stone-motion-for-retrial/4a8bb3f41efc379752c2/optimized/full.pdf
Start here: Judge Jackson delved into the VERY argument that @NunbergSam slavishly repeats that the forewoman lied in this publicly available, easily obtainable ruling.../4 https://int.nyt.com/data/documenthelper/6892-roger-stone-motion-for-retrial/4a8bb3f41efc379752c2/optimized/full.pdf
...the big problem was, Stone's lawyers could never produce a word that was a lie this woman supposedly told, even though @NunbergSam states that it was done as if it was fact.
Just these words should have been a heads up to Sam. But it gets much worse.../5
Just these words should have been a heads up to Sam. But it gets much worse.../5
...now again, the foundation of the Hannity/Stone argument is two fold: Having a negative opinion about Trump (but somehow, the same doesnt apply to a positive opinion) makes someone too biased to be a juror on Stone. Second, lawyers argued, she lied about whether she ever...
...posted anything about Trump. She did, so therefore, in the Hannity/Stone/ @NunbergSam argument, she lied.
But...what did she say? It is on her jury questionnaire - this is the purported "lie.".../6
But...what did she say? It is on her jury questionnaire - this is the purported "lie.".../6
...so, the "lie" is, "I dont remember. I may have shared an article on Facebook, but I don't know." Stone's lawyers had access to that statement from the start, before she was sworn in. Her Facebook page was public. So what do we find when we search it? Guess, @NunbergSam.../7
...she shared an article. Yup, what she said she "may" have done. Oh, & what was the article? Something saying Trump is a crook and everyone associated with him should go to jail?
Nope, @NunbergSam - she shared an article that was a list of the cases in the Mueller inquiry.../8
Nope, @NunbergSam - she shared an article that was a list of the cases in the Mueller inquiry.../8
...now, she did also retweet another person's tweet who was questioning why Roger Stone's arrest set off media handwringing about force guidelines while the arrest of 8 African Americans in similar situation did not.../9
...and whats the conclusion of the judge on the argument that her saying "I made have done this, i don't remember" was a lie? She called it crap. And btw Sam - because they filed it in court, Stone's lawyers argument is protected from libel claim. Your TV statement isn't.../10
...what about what she was asked in void dir? Here are her words....
...this goes on and on like this. People like @NunbergSam seem to believe they can get on TV, say whatever they want to bully people who did nothing more than their civic duty, and then burble and preen with the expectation no one will do anything.
I will. Sue him, forewoman...
I will. Sue him, forewoman...
...I will do whatever needs to be done to help out. And yes, any lawyers who are on my feed, please represent her pro bono. People like @NunbergSam need to find out that bullying may get laughs and snickers from the GOP scumbag room, but in the real world, you pay a price.
end
end
