1/6
If you only look at Billy’s LinkedIn profile and the video, his connection to the Oceanic OBOR does raise a legitimate red flag.

Lets first look at the context around this speech

Point 1
What was Billy doing at the time to earn money to put food on the table for his family?

2/6
He was a consultant for indigenous groups, specifically helping them negotiate business opportunities. Billy mentions he is also representing the Maori King Tuheitia as the ambassador of international trade.

What is the content of the discussion regarding a deal?

3/6
Billy mentions extracting value from the land as they are asset rich though cash flow poor. He says he is seeking funding from the “right type of partner” to turn some land into export businesses to expand the quantities of our existing export products

4/6
In Vinny Eastwood's second interview with Billy, he says:

That when he thought they had agreed on a price, they would turn around later to try & get a cheaper price.

Billy also declined a 5 star all expenses paid trip to China after he had learned their tactics.

5/6
People are taking this context as being as bad as someone making a deal with an entity like the CCP

Should we be critical of Billy for simply discussing a business partnership with OBOR when it didn’t go through?

For looking to provide jobs & income for Maori families?

6/6
On a separate note:

How did this meeting come to be?

Who singed NZ up to the OBOR agreement in the first place?

I found this comment on the original OBOR YT video that gives some context.

1/3
Point 2 for Trump supporters/anons.

Lets compare this to a deal that went through which is a legitimate red flag for Trump.

In 1991 Trump struck a bankruptcy deal with Wilbur Ross (Head of Rothschild Inc.’s bankruptcy advising team and now Secretary of Commerce).

2/3
Where Trump would relinquish a 50% stake in his Taj Mahal casino in return for better debt terms.

It’s up to speculation what else may or may not have been agreed upon in this deal with the Rothschilds company. https://www.forbes.com/sites/chasewithorn/2016/12/08/trump-and-his-commerce-secretary-wilbur-ross-a-look-at-25-years-of-connections/

3/3
However, does that outweigh all the things Trump has said/done?

Such as:
Taking control of the FED from the Rothschilds.
Commitment to end human trafficking worldwide.
Multiple EO’s to combat human trafficking & the 1,000’s of children saved.
All the 17 proofs/coincidences?

Point 3
1/5
To quote 1984 “The party is always right”

Is there evidence on the other side of the scale of Billy’s alleged allegiance to the CCP?

Lets look at a couple examples of people who have clear allegiance to the CCP and what they say/ do not say.

2/5
Dr. Tedros of the WHO
Has often spoken positively about the CCP’s response to C0vid, especially early on.

A recent contradiction in the WHO’s timeline has shown the CCP failed to inform the WHO proving the CCP wasn’t transparent in the early stages

https://www.theepochtimes.com/republicans-call-on-world-health-organizations-director-general-to-testify-before-congress_3418846.html

3/5
Carrie Lam - Hong Kong
She defended the introduction of the National Security Law, was silent while it was being introduced and is now saying “Its not all doom and gloom”

Here is just some of the impact in the first week:
https://www.theepochtimes.com/what-transpired-in-the-first-week-of-beijings-security-law-taking-effect-in-hong-kong_3413850.html

4/5
So if @BillyTeKahika is loyal to/controlled by the CCP do you think he would:

Publicly make the accusation that C0vid 19 was an intentionally released a bio weapon.

Advocate for the people of New Zealand to have rights, sovereignty & freedom.

5/5
Push for accountability & transparency in our government.

Call out communism as 2 tier system with the elites living luxury lifestyles.

Could Tedros/Carrie get away with stating any of those accusations publicly?

Do those accusations sound like someone loyal to the CCP?