This conclusion is derived from many weak evidence (marginal p-value). Some western blots aren't visually significant. I am most concerned about the human Gpld1 stats (p = 0.03-4). There is a large variation in exercise group. I doubt if knowledge can be translated to human.
As the main conclusion is derived from multiple p = 0.04 observations, the chance of having >=1 false positive that collapses the entire evidence chain can be large. I encourage the research community to reproduce, and journalist to calm down.
You can follow @houndcl.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.