2. I think of friends who refuse to look at evidence and are not interested in the Red Pill.
Is it possible that their refusal to look is that they dare not consider that there are people in the world who could act in vile, decadent and evil ways?
Is it possible that their refusal to look is that they dare not consider that there are people in the world who could act in vile, decadent and evil ways?
3. Are conversations about:
-Paedophilia
-Sterilisation from vaccines
-Orchestrated flash flags...
Too unbelievable to consider as they violate our assumptions on the general goodness of humanity.
-Paedophilia
-Sterilisation from vaccines
-Orchestrated flash flags...
Too unbelievable to consider as they violate our assumptions on the general goodness of humanity.
4. Is it possible that the world cannot heal until we have the courage to call:
-Corruption as corruption
-Perversion as perversion
-Evil as evil
-Corruption as corruption
-Perversion as perversion
-Evil as evil
5. On the streets we see the destruction of statues but looking deeper we can see that dissolution of Standards is the key issue behind it.
Without Standards, everything and anything goes.
Nothing becomes off limits.
Without Standards, everything and anything goes.
Nothing becomes off limits.
6. When I hear of people looting, destroying property and assaulting uninvolved bystanders, I also hear the apologists who are giving considerations for why people behave this way.
7. They will talk of these people as:
-Repressed and angry
-Justice seekers
-People who have suffered injustice
-Expressing their rights to free speech etc.
-Repressed and angry
-Justice seekers
-People who have suffered injustice
-Expressing their rights to free speech etc.
8. What we don’t hear from media or the experts is that people loot, destroy property and bash others because they CHOOSE to loot, destroy and bash.
9. True disempowerment of a societal group happens when we don't acknowledge their responsibly in their choices and instead run cover for their actions. This gives us the power as moral arbiters while leaving the societal group we are defending even more disempowered.
10. The result is living with two realities. One we can objectively observe and one that is fabricated based on our considerations.
11. I used to think it was rigid beliefs that prevented people from being Red-pilled. Now I see that is not the case. Beliefs play a role as ideological anchors that help entrap the mind into fixed ways of thinking.
12. However more important to the red-pilling conversation are ‘considerations.’ They are a type of linguistic hypnosis; a veil upon the mind; that filters what will be allowed to enter consciousness.
13. When I talk to some friends about Trump. They can express a ‘belief’ that he is bad, corrupt, stupid etc (media influence)
What is more noticeable however, is their refusal to entertain any ‘consideration’ that he might be working toward the good of the people and the world.
What is more noticeable however, is their refusal to entertain any ‘consideration’ that he might be working toward the good of the people and the world.
14. There appears to be a veil over their minds that they wont cross.
What is it that makes well-meaning, intelligent people terrified to consider the possibility that President Donald Trump is a good person?
What is it that makes well-meaning, intelligent people terrified to consider the possibility that President Donald Trump is a good person?
15. I think the answer is this. An admission that President Trump is good is also an admission that the forces of darkness and evil attempting to destroy him are real.
16. This would force them to consider.
-The media is corrupt and spews propaganda
-Many politicians do not have their best interests at heart
-There are colluding forces attempting to destroy our democracy
-And much worse
-The media is corrupt and spews propaganda
-Many politicians do not have their best interests at heart
-There are colluding forces attempting to destroy our democracy
-And much worse
17. For the patriots this is not new. But for people who have been brought up to believe in the truthfulness of the media and the general good-will of politicians, if this ‘consideration’ was allowed to engage consciousness, the person’s very sense of reality would be rattled.
18. What if the horrors and the atrocities of the Deepstate have been right in front of our eyes, but because they were too unbelievable to consider being done by people we trust, they have not landed in our consciousness for serious review. (Think 9/11)
19. When we are unwilling to call reality as we observe it and instead make our considerations based on either apologetics or obedience to the fed narrative, we allow the Deepstate licence to continue to operate.
20. UNBELIEVABILITY in the context discussed here could be stated as:
The unwillingness to acknowledge and allow to enter our mind that people truly are capable of horrendous acts of evil and that there are people who would enslave us to the system and deny us our freedom.
The unwillingness to acknowledge and allow to enter our mind that people truly are capable of horrendous acts of evil and that there are people who would enslave us to the system and deny us our freedom.
21. UNBELIEVABILITY is the weapon of the Deepstate. We are controlled not only by what we believe but by what we refuse to see and acknowledge.
End.
End.