The notion that we’re safer keeping schools shut if infection rates aren’t low is based on a middle-class conception of “home.” As I’ve written, a safer crisis policy would have been to keep schools open, perhaps without teaching, to protect families hygenicaly and economically
We tend to have a constructed view of schools as places that impart knowledge. In practice, that’s perhaps their fourth most important function until the last years of secondary. I’ve visited deprived communities that have turned around by making their schools 24-hour hubs
I've also written about this favela in Sao Paulo that ended its status as the most violent place in the world in large part by turning the school, formerly open 4 hours a day (as is typical in Brazil) into an all-day focal point.

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/mud-floor-to-middle-class/article4327172/
(That second tweet should say "constricted" rather than "constructed")
There is a solid body of scholarship on the health, safety and development/integration benefits of using schools beyond their usual hours and purposes

https://twitter.com/ddziewan/status/1281653524254715904?s=21 https://twitter.com/ddziewan/status/1281653524254715904
You can follow @DougSaunders.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.