I've posted @lawfare:
"The Imaginary Unitary Executive."

"Contrary to The Decision of 1789 myth, which SCOTUS relied on to expand presidential power, the legislative record and a diary show that the first Congress rejected the exclusive unitary model." https://www.lawfareblog.com/imaginary-unitary-executive
2/
Big thanks to @benjaminwittes & @qjurecic for their excellent editing over a holiday weekend to get this posted at the start of a big SCOTUS week.

After CFPB case last week, I'm curious if Roberts Court doubles down on the unitary myth on tax subpoena cases this week.
3/ It's based on 2 chapters from my book project "The Imaginary Unitary Executive."

First: "The Indecisions of 1789: Strategic Ambiguity and the Imaginary Unitary Executive"

On the Madison strategy, the House debate & shows Senator Maclay's diary.
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3596566
4/
Part II:
"The Decisions of 1789 Were Non-Unitary: Removal by Judiciary and the Imaginary Unitary Executive"

Focused on the Treasury Act of 1789 & many statutes from the first Congress and the early republic delegating removal power to judges & juries.
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3597496
6) Additional thanks in the essay:
"Thanks to the wonderful First Congress Project at George Washington U., [Maclay's diary] has been on seminar syllabi for at least two decades. That’s how I read it in Professor @jbf1755 Joanne Freeman’s graduate seminar in Spring 2000."
You can follow @jedshug.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.