Read on Twitter
Thread: Refuting "Disproving Islam"s lies in just one part of a page
After a long day, I decided to read @DisprovingIslam 's amazing Joke book.
The following makes me wonder if he is intentionally deceiving his followers because they won't bother to check!
After a long day, I decided to read @DisprovingIslam 's amazing Joke book.
The following makes me wonder if he is intentionally deceiving his followers because they won't bother to check!
1: The word "7" in Surah 23:86 was inserted later.
Doesn't seem so. I think he's referring to the example in Brubaker's book, but he quoted the wrong manuscript!
Anyways, the phrase is clearly found in earlier manuscripts from the 7th century such as Or. 2165 (right)
Doesn't seem so. I think he's referring to the example in Brubaker's book, but he quoted the wrong manuscript!
Anyways, the phrase is clearly found in earlier manuscripts from the 7th century such as Or. 2165 (right)
2. In Surah 66:8, he said in the Topkapi it says: Repent until you give by it sincerely.
This makes me really question his integrity! The verse is clearly identical to what we read today, AND the only insertion is the letters "لله" in the word Allah. Clearly that was accidental!
This makes me really question his integrity! The verse is clearly identical to what we read today, AND the only insertion is the letters "لله" in the word Allah. Clearly that was accidental!
3. In Surah 3:158, he states there is some difference in the verse with what we recite today. This clearly shows his deception.
The verse is identical to what we recite today! Still doubtful? The verse is present in earlier dated (7th century) Arabe 328a (3rd pic) & others.
The verse is identical to what we recite today! Still doubtful? The verse is present in earlier dated (7th century) Arabe 328a (3rd pic) & others.
4. He claims in Surah 14:38, it says : "You know what we conceal and what he revealED " instead of we reveal.
Doesn't really seem that way, does it? Anyways, the same verse is found in many earlier dated manuscripts too.
Doesn't really seem that way, does it? Anyways, the same verse is found in many earlier dated manuscripts too.
5. He states that in Surah 73:20 in the Topkapi, there is an erasure between "ثلثي" & "الليل" .
This is the only example where he didn't quote something false. Yet, there is NO missing word in earlier manuscripts such as 7th century DAM 01-29.1, thus showing it was accidental.
This is the only example where he didn't quote something false. Yet, there is NO missing word in earlier manuscripts such as 7th century DAM 01-29.1, thus showing it was accidental.
Amazing deception @DisprovingIslam , out of your 5 examples, 4 are fake, the other is easily refutable.
We'll continue onto your next claim on the Codex Parisino-Petropolitanus
We'll continue onto your next claim on the Codex Parisino-Petropolitanus
You claimed that 14:37 in Arabe 328a differs from the Cairo Text, I'm guessing your difference is the difference of the letter "ف" instead of "و". Yet, the text obviously has the letter "ف" , thus the verse is completely identical to the Qur'an we recite today
You claimed "why does it all matter if they (the Qur'an) was written in the 8th century?"
Yeah, scholars clearly disagree with you:
Yeah, scholars clearly disagree with you:
