I've said this before, Stonewall is a protection racket.

If an org or company doesn't pay up for 'training' etc, isn't on the 'champions' list, they are in the crosshairs. If a company fails to deal with an errant employee, then the threats start. https://twitter.com/RCollumbell/status/1276789806366887936

I see how corruption and capture have resulted in this. But, I still want to know what the bullet is. Stonewall subtly threaten any orgs not 'championed' (paid up), and obviously Stonewall will besmirch them, but there must be more. What is the price of refusing to pay to>

>be a 'champion'? There must be a price. Simply not being on the safe list isn't enough, the CEOs must be under tangible threat.

What is it? What have these bloated QANGOIDS got on our institutions?

The stink is of 'undemocratic'.

It sounds tin-hatted, but the corruption is obvious and the business model undeniable.

Maybe a talented author could run with this idea!

A former genuine campaign group became advocacy, then became lobby and thereafter, high stakes organised crime.