Read on Twitter
Muxe, “two-spirit”, hijra & other “third gender” categories don’t prove historical existence of “trans people”. Societies have always placed homosexual men or gender non-conforming men into the category of “other”, whatever it’s called. 1/5 #IStandWithJKR
In many societies “other” is woman. But they know these “third gender” or “transwomen” men aren’t for breeding, they just don’t deserve the status of human/man. “Third gender”, “gender spectrum” and “trans” is not progressive, it’s misogyny. 2/5
Men who don’t fulfill masculinity must be excluded from being called and viewed as men. Men with “feminine” traits (including attraction to men), who don’t oppose submission and humiliation, must be excluded from the category of man. 3/5
Submission and humiliation are “traits of women” according to societies accepting of “third gender” and “transgender”. The category of man must remain intact and untouched because it determines who is a complete human. 4/5
“Third gender” categories don’t prove a society is progressive. It doesn’t prove a “gender spectrum”. The only “trans” it proves is that misogyny is transcultural and transhistorical. It proves anything associated with “woman” must be purged from “man” to keep “man” pure. 5/5