Read on Twitter
I’m interested in what #MadTwitter thinks of this. A few of us #LXPs had been wanting to work with @NHSEngland on a survivor led response. I was interested in this but noted that the co-production mentioned was led by @pickereurope. The ‘about us’ section does not mention any > https://twitter.com/clairem7523/status/1277530747096764418
#LXPs being employed. Lots of high profile or skilled people, but none working from an experiential lens. Yet the co-production model is registered and used in a sizeable number of #NHS trusts. This worries me because there is no mention of a partnership with a survivor-led org >
> and @pickereurope appears to not employ #LXPs (people who openly work from an experiential lens) within their main staff. As the survivor movement has developed its own truly co-produced models and ways of working, and we have our own academics who champion this, I wonder why >
> our own consultants and organisations are not employed to do this? For a consultancy to educate systems in embedding co-production within its structures, it needs to be able to model this and also to have understood how to do this within its own structures. At the very least >
> training should be designed and delivered by a partnership that is on equal decision making and power sharing terms (the very definition of co-production) where at least one organisation is SU-led. I despair when I see this, when will the hard work of the activists who >
> created this way of working lead it, receive the recognition they deserve for it, be paid for it? What do #LXPs think? @NSUNnews @BeresfordPeter @AlisonF101 @SchrebersSister @DianaRose160 @Freedom71573997 @HoppyPelican @Al_Richards_786 @junglesheen @SuresearchMH @DavidGilbert43
