Read on Twitter
Genuinely confused.. interview with Keir Starmer, @piersmorgan said @RLong_Bailey sacking was because she attacked the jews. There was no mention of "jews" in the @Independent interview with @MPeakeOfficial. She referred to the Israeli Secret Services. 1/
Almost 25% of the population in Israel is non-Jewish. Are both Morgan & Starmer saying that only Jews are allowed to be recruited into the Israeli Secret Service or the police force? Or, are they saying that only the Jews within those organisation are accused of wrongdoings? 2/
If either of these conclusions are to be accepted then surely this is more AS than the comment made by Ms Peake. There's plenty of footage of Israeli Security Services employing this strategy (but unclear whether they involve Jewish Israelis or non-Jewish Israelis). /3
If the ISS employ this strategy (as evidenced), it's inconceivable that this wouldn't be included in any training they undertake. If the Minn police already used this technique & the ISS didn't agree with it why were the US police not instructed to abandon this strategy? /4
So my confusion is two fold - what is AS & who exactly is guilty of it in this instance; and, do the Minn police pay for & undertake training from outside agencies then ignore what they're taught or did the ISS cover this strategy but are denying it? /5
