There is a theory around the whole Dr Disrespect thing that some believe to be true, and given the response to a few things, I think it might be true also.

During his last livestream, doc gets a text, his attitude changes, he says "We wil get through this guys", ends the stream.

It's then announced that Doc is perma banned from Twitch, but Twitches lips are locked fucking tight, as are Docs. As are other streamers who know about the situation. People found this wierd, conspiracies start popping up.

People assume a MeToo among many other things.

This was cemented further when sponsors dropped Doc, but then shortly afterwards, all his sponsors re-instate him.

I think it's because the sponsors just heard there was drama and jumped right away to avoid controversy, but they were then informed of what was REALLY going on.

Sponsors then thought "oh, that's not actually a bad thing" and reinstated him.

This leads me to believe that there is no MeToo or cheating on his wife involved, more so because his wife came right out in support of him.

Which is why there is one conspiracy I think is true.

Given the shutdown of Mixer with lots of streamers looking for somewhere to go, and not wanting to come back to Twitch because its so fucking terrible, I think a lot of big name streamers, including Doc, were goooing to create a twitch alternative, run by the big name streamers.

Twitch found out all about this, and started just nuking everyone involved, leading me too believe that Doc was one of the big players in setting up this new platform, the biggest on Twitch at least, hence his big instaban and the silence around it.

I think there are massive lawsuits inbound between Twitch and streamers, which is why no one is talking about it.

The streamers might be held by NDA or violated some contract with Twitch, so in a legal sense, it's good to shut the fuck up until the trial is over.

And Twitch is being quiet about it, because they know they will look seriously bad if they go after huge name streamers that are loved by like 90% of their userbase, the company risks it's whole userbase turning against it.

Maybe this is true, maybe it isn't. Let's see.