What next with @GenFlynn case?

There's been a lot of speculation following The District of Columbia Court of Appeals decision to grant in part @SidneyPowell1 petition for Writ of Mandamus.

@WashTimes posted June 24 2020 that Judge Sullivan may appeal the decision.
(thread)
According to DCCA Rule 35 - Petition for hearing or rehearing en banc, Judge Sullivan who is NOT a party to the case is NOT therefore entitled to request en banc.

That is reserved for
a) A majority of the Court of Appeals active 11 judges
b) The parties

(thread)
For appeals court judges to request en banc, one of the judges must request a vote.
This is where we find out just how corrupt DCCA is.
Many believe the high standard of being NON-PARTISAN has been abandoned.
There are:
6 Democrat appointees
5 Republican appointees

(thread)
So what next❓
It wouldn't surprise anyone if dissenting Judge Wilkins requests a rehearing en banc vote.
He needs all 5 of his fellow democrat appointees to agree to it, and they have some high hurdles to jump to justify it.

Judge Rao covered both options excellently

(thread)
Will this EVER be over❓
Remember, any of the appeals judges can petition for en blanc rehearing.

IF the Court of Appeals is as Partisan as many fear, the game is DELAY DELAY DELAY so we are likely to see a petition on deadline date as defined by RULE 40.

It is July 8, 2020.
The DC Courts can ill afford anymore scandals, and the Judges would do well to seriously consider the consequences of allowing an En Banc rehearing of the Flynn Case.

I hope we're celebrating the end of this fiasco by July 9, 2020

Obama's Deep State has been RELENTLESS EVIL
For the great legal minds out there, please feel free to clarify any errors or omissions.
Thanks Si
You can follow @TheSilentLOUD.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.