India signed the UN Convention against Torture in 1997 but it still hasn't ratified it despite domestic and international pressure. A domestic bill against torture was revised by a select committee of Rajya Sabha that was again diluted in Law Comm version & still languishing 2/10
Even in the absence of a domestic bill, there are constitutional & statutory safeguards against torture in India. Supreme Court has clearly stated that custodial torture is unacceptable in a democracy using art 21. There are statutory provisions also meant to prevent torture 4/10
Two of the biggest safeguards that are applicable here are the medical examinations and the role of the magistrates in ensuring that the persons have not been tortured in custody. yet one finds time & again that the magistrates and the doctors fail to fulfill this role. 5/10
Observed in many terror related cases as narrated by SAR Geelani in Nitya Ramakrishnan's important book In Custody https://books.google.com/books/about/In_Custody.html?id=w5-HAwAAQBAJ Also great overview of laws and limits & explanation of torture as public secret in South Asia. Lack of prosecution & some compensation 8/10
In my book #Truthmachines, I argue: rather than focus only on police, attention on "scaffold of rule of law" created by active participation of magistrates & doctors in not just enabling torture but masking it with procedures meant to hide violence.9/10 https://www.fulcrum.org/concern/monographs/5425kc41s
I focus on terror cases to illustrate the role of police, magistrates and doctors in creating this scaffold, but as Tamil Nadu case shows, torture is not restricted to terror case or conflict areas, but routinely used and only becomes an issue if there is a custodial death.10/10
You can follow @LokaneetaJinee.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.