Sorry to be a bit imodest for a minute...

...but if you were following me last week you would have known this already...

Don’t read the excitable headline - read the article.
2/
So this is what is being lined up:

1. UK claims “victory over Europe” by maintaining chunks of Single market + free trade deal. With “cast iron guarantee” that UK can diverge from this.

2. Newspapers hail Boris & Brexit

3. UK doesn’t diverge too much as price too high
3/

4. It’s basically a disguised “May’s deal” with nationalistic bells & whistles built in

5. A Corona weary UK accepts this

6. Remainers are then ridiculed for saying Brexit would be terrible as £ surges and economy doesn’t collapse

7. The whole think will have cost billions
4/

8. UK will essentially follow much of EU - with no say - but “winning” right to independence would then precipitate mini no deals like situations - so would be avoided.

9. Brexit will have cost hundreds of billions by 2030 but much of this merely absorbed in higher govt debt
5/

This is the best - politically available - scenario right now...

...& is still not certain.

But as I said last week, is being seriously looked at in Brussels AND London.

It’s a “non-extension extension” or “Switzerland minus”.

..& then the real Brexit debate starts...
6/

In other words a potential Brexit deal needs

1. UK needs to show it won independence
2. EU market or rules not to be diluted

These 2 things look mutually exclusive but if you concentrate on the “show” part of the independence there’s a way to square the circle.
You can follow @nicktolhurst.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.