Read on Twitter
Just now @EnergyCommerce started their hearing on "disinformation".
Find our thread below as we set the record straight
https://energycommerce.house.gov/committee-activity/hearings/joint-hearing-on-a-country-in-crisis-how-disinformation-online-is
Find our thread below as we set the record straight
https://energycommerce.house.gov/committee-activity/hearings/joint-hearing-on-a-country-in-crisis-how-disinformation-online-is
. @USRepMikeDoyle wants to protect our democracy. We agree! But that starts with upholding our constitution, a document that prevents the government from regulating or compelling speech.
Senator Cotton says tech can't restrict political speech... Senator @janschakowsky says the exact opposite...
A friendly reminder to all-- online free speech is a tool that we ALL can use as the antidote to hateful speech. Censorship hurts us all.
Tech platforms are dealing with moderation issues never before found in human history.
These companies spend billions of dollars to combat bad content-- taking action on over 5 billion posts and accounts in just 6 months
http://netchoice.org/transparencyreport2019
These companies spend billions of dollars to combat bad content-- taking action on over 5 billion posts and accounts in just 6 months
http://netchoice.org/transparencyreport2019
Now I could show you real speed with my tweets on Mr. Neil Fried's testimony but, honestly, I couldn't put it better than this right here:
https://netchoice.org/factcheckingfriedtestimony
https://netchoice.org/factcheckingfriedtestimony
I can't help myself
-- Fried claims imposing a "duty of care" won't raise censorship concerns.
BUT it'll do exactly that: the gov't will regulate which speech is and isn't reasonable.
-- Fried claims imposing a "duty of care" won't raise censorship concerns.BUT it'll do exactly that: the gov't will regulate which speech is and isn't reasonable.
