1️⃣ Imagine commissioning the 2017 @DavidLammy Review (see extract) that:

- Highlighted racial inequality at every stage of criminal justice EXCEPT jury verdicts;

- Made 37 recommendations

Then instead of implementing any of those, deciding to reduce the use of juries...
4️⃣ If the government had any interest in clearing the backlog in a fair way, off the top of my head I can think of things it could do...
5️⃣
🔸Open new court buildings
🔸Heavily recruit judges from the top of our profession.
🔸Stop clogging up courts with minor drugs, theft and criminal damage cases
🔸Divert addicts, youths, people with mental health issues & other vulnerabilities away from court
6️⃣ Don't let them fool you. Either way offences are serious matters. Any criminal conviction can cause you to lose your job, home, ability to travel, to vote, not to mention the effect on your relationships. That's why there is an option to have a jury trial for certain offences
7️⃣ Also see @Joanna__Hardy's thread on the complete lack of diversity in the judiciary https://twitter.com/Joanna__Hardy/status/1275164340639993856?s=19
8️⃣ See @BarristerSecret's thread on why these proposals are appalling and disingenuous https://twitter.com/BarristerSecret/status/1275357343019040768?s=19
9️⃣ See also @MaxJLHardy thread on why juries are important. https://twitter.com/MaxJLHardy/status/1275496952369688578?s=19
🔟 See also @SarahVAtDSC thread here: https://twitter.com/SarahVAtDSC/status/1274709853391503360?s=19 (it's almost like the profession is really passionate about jury trials, eh?)
You can follow @BarristerAbi.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.