Read on Twitter
We need to have a conference podcast with leaders in different movements/political sides to come together and meet weekly to discuss. It should be live, it should have a moderator, and it should have breaks to settle tension. The trust im seeing is unreal..
Podcasts are cool, but it's a lot of echo chambers that talk about other groups and issues with a safe level of agreement comfort that nudge their internal temperature on issues. But rarely are these groups actually talking to each other.
So assumptions are made, gaps are in place, and takeaways are either "wow I disagreed with this very much and I'm going to share and tell others why" or "this made me feel more right, look at this", but the actual consensus on the issue across the board barely moves...
.And actually takes a huge amount of energy to happen. We need dialogue from these voices we listen to within our groups by having them talk to EACH OTHER.
You know what built a bridge and trust that was really rare and almost instant? When @benshapiro and @AndrewYang talked...
You know what built a bridge and trust that was really rare and almost instant? When @benshapiro and @AndrewYang talked...
If we are actually going to break a cycle we need to be able to clear the room and figure out how to build trust. How to actually show conflict resolution in some meaningful way..
We are so paranoid, accusatory, and our expectations of a good relationships are fantasized.
We are so paranoid, accusatory, and our expectations of a good relationships are fantasized.
I listen to a lot of voices across the spectrum and across a lot of interests and it's very clear no one is really talking to each other...
And we are identifying problems and trying to think about the bigger picture but we should also talk and engage as a bigger picture.
And we are identifying problems and trying to think about the bigger picture but we should also talk and engage as a bigger picture.
