The Peculiar Case of John Bolton & the Accuracy of the Term 'Traitor'
I never understood the hiring of John Bolton. How do you campaign for & run the Oval Office predicated on draining the swamp & then turn around & hire THAT guy? Maybe this explains it.
https://politicalmoonshine.com/
I never understood the hiring of John Bolton. How do you campaign for & run the Oval Office predicated on draining the swamp & then turn around & hire THAT guy? Maybe this explains it.
https://politicalmoonshine.com/
1. For this train to even leave the station, we must acknowledge one fundamental concession. What the President has faced since before inauguration has been a Deep State overthrow effort on one continuum: Flynn, Russia, Mueller, Ukraine, impeachment, COVID-19 & the new race war.
2. It's FLYNN FIRST! As goes Flynn, so goes the country. Quite literally all of this began with the preliminary targeting of Flynn (coup launch) & when HR McMaster (coup foundation) replaced him as NatSecAdv, the broader coup effort was firmly established. https://twitter.com/POLITICALMOONS1/status/1272647725595521024?s=20
3. With Flynn targeted & out, why would Mr. Trump even consider bringing on board McMaster followed by Bolton (coup clean-up); especially given his certain knowledge of the broader effort to remove him from office? That's entirely antithetical to anti-swampiness.
4. Mr. Trump certainly had foreknowledge of this landscape and that gives us an angle to answer our question. It's important to recall the President's modus operandi: inviting enemies into their own construct before closing-off all of the exits except the suicidal path forward.
5. The relevant question becomes whether the objective is to prosecute for 1) conspiracy -or- 2) the actual commission of the crime(s)? These two endeavors are entirely different universes; the latter being the objective, which requires patience/waiting. https://twitter.com/POLITICALMOONS1/status/1273344200772169728?s=20
6. Accepting 1-5, we can state that the President's enemies established the underlying timeline, which is aligned to 03 Nov 20. POTUS' response is calibrated to it. All of this suggests evidence of a real 'plan’ & all of this could legitimize Q as a valid form of communication.
7. So then, why did POTUS hire (1st McMaster) Bolton to begin? Look at today for the answer. It's apparent Bolton was hitting clean-up on the coup effort, hence the demands for him during impeachment, & the book is the contingency to angle on Trump after being forced outside-in.
8. This operation had parallel tracks of importance for the Deep State and most importantly, it removed the single greatest threat encroaching on their treasonous efforts at self-preservation - @GenFlynn. 2ndly, they gained leverage inside-out with subsequent appts. of HRM & JB.
9. Let's piece it together: They wanted in & they had to be in. There was no other way after losing 2016. The President clearly knew this so he invited them in & as we always point-out, he then promptly closed-off all the exits except for the path forward where the gallows wait.
10. We see the coalescence around the also-fired Mattis & the emerging cohort of military brass & civilian military leadership currently working to cleave the military away from its commander in chief. It's reasonable to believe Bolton has been an asset in this the entire time.
11. The internationally swampy geopolitical landscape is essentially the only thing Bolton has ever known after entering the arena in 1985 as a Vietnam veteran having been appointed as USAAG by President Reagan. Wouldn't a former USAAG/NatSecAdv be familiar with classification?
12. You don't need me to tell you the answer. Bolton's hiring never made sense. POTUS invited Bolton (& McMaster) in for a purpose. Bolton betrayed his country & the American people as a functionary in an effort to overthrow the presidency ergo traitor is an appropriate term.