Another agnostic approval.
#Pembrolizumab
#TMB
TMB
cutoff >=

Though I’m overall very supportive of agnostic approvals overall, not sure if TMB
is the same across tissue types.
@US_FDA #OncoAlert #PrecisionMedicine
https://seekingalpha.com/news/3583617-fda-oks-mercks-keytruda-for-second-application-based-on-biomarker?source=tweet https://seekingalpha.com/news/3583617-fda-oks-mercks-keytruda-for-second-application-based-on-biomarker
#Pembrolizumab






Though I’m overall very supportive of agnostic approvals overall, not sure if TMB

@US_FDA #OncoAlert #PrecisionMedicine
https://seekingalpha.com/news/3583617-fda-oks-mercks-keytruda-for-second-application-based-on-biomarker?source=tweet https://seekingalpha.com/news/3583617-fda-oks-mercks-keytruda-for-second-application-based-on-biomarker
TMB
is part of the story. Cutoff of 
not sure if that even is applicable to a lot of GI tumors including MSI
. Even within MSI
seems like the cutoff appears to be a lot higher in responders
non-responders. The 10-18ish in the intermediate TMB
benefit at least in GI.







Even the patients accrued don’t meet definition of agnostic:
“158 trial accrued patients with anal, biliary, cervical, endometrial, salivary, thyroid, or vulvar carcinoma, mesothelioma, a neuroendocrine tumor, or small cell lung cancer.”
Also baffling: OS worse in TMB
.
“158 trial accrued patients with anal, biliary, cervical, endometrial, salivary, thyroid, or vulvar carcinoma, mesothelioma, a neuroendocrine tumor, or small cell lung cancer.”


More on spectrum of #cancers in #Keynote158 & the tale of crossing curves similar to most #Immunotherapy studies.
tail of prolonged benefit noted in a subset of patients. As noted 
concern is “agnostic” approval is missing:
breast
colorectal
NSCLC
Prostate
@GerkIvan







@GerkIvan