1/6 #SSWGTC20
benefits from wildlife = improved views & actions toward wildlife, right?
Common assumption for #CommunityBasedConservation, but not many studies that assess these relationships
We
at these links using the case of #Endangered reticulated
in #Kenya
![Pfeil nach oben ⬆️](https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/2b06.png)
Common assumption for #CommunityBasedConservation, but not many studies that assess these relationships
We
![Augen 👀](https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/1f440.png)
![Giraffe 🦒](https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/1f992.png)
![Flagge von Kenia 🇰🇪](https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/1f1f0-1f1ea.png)
2/6 There are a # of benefits/costs, tangible/intangible, connected to wildlife conservation
In any community, there’s a diversity of ability/access/motivations to participate in conservation
We
at perceptions of benefits, attitudes toward #giraffe, past
meat consumption
In any community, there’s a diversity of ability/access/motivations to participate in conservation
We
![Augen 👀](https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/1f440.png)
![Giraffe 🦒](https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/1f992.png)
6/6 If shifting attitudes is intended outcome,
specificity of benefit types may be more effective (
of which ben. & process of distribution)
More often, a need to change behaviors tied to wildlife threats. No evidence in our study of link between
related benefits & beh.
![Pfeil nach oben ⬆️](https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/2b06.png)
![Rotes Fragezeichen-Symbol ❓](https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/2753.png)
More often, a need to change behaviors tied to wildlife threats. No evidence in our study of link between
![Giraffe 🦒](https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/1f992.png)
4/6 At both sites, attitudes more
positive from those with perceived cons benefits
Different types of benefits can influence attitude toward
at varying levels of strength and by direction
/
![Pfeil nach oben ⬆️](https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/2b06.png)
Different types of benefits can influence attitude toward
![Giraffe 🦒](https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/1f992.png)
![Tabelle mit Aufwärtstrend 📈](https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/1f4c8.png)
![Tabelle mit Abwärtstrend 📉](https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/1f4c9.png)
3/6 We asked:
Y/N for different types of benefits – two types ($ from tourism & job in cons/tourism) coded as cons benefits
Attitude toward giraffe on 5p scale
Most recent time of giraffe meat/part use – re-coded into never/1+ year/within last year
![Giraffe 🦒](https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/1f992.png)
![Giraffe 🦒](https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/1f992.png)
![Giraffe 🦒](https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/1f992.png)
5/6 Limited results to suggest connection b/w perceived cons benefits &
meat/part consumption
Those w/ cons benefits just as likely to have consumed
meat (illegal in
)
This makes sense, as human behavior is complex, including wild meat consumption (see @juliavanvel)
![Giraffe 🦒](https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/1f992.png)
Those w/ cons benefits just as likely to have consumed
![Giraffe 🦒](https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/1f992.png)
![Flagge von Kenia 🇰🇪](https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/1f1f0-1f1ea.png)
This makes sense, as human behavior is complex, including wild meat consumption (see @juliavanvel)