There’s a huge difference in a remote-work company vs a company working remotely.
The first is deliberately designed so people thrive in a remote-preferred environment.
The other exports face-to-face culture to a digital environment then wonders why performance is sub-par.
The first is deliberately designed so people thrive in a remote-preferred environment.
The other exports face-to-face culture to a digital environment then wonders why performance is sub-par.
You’ll find the same in a digital company vs a company that uses digital.
And yes, same in a data & evidence led company vs one that uses data & evidence.
And yes, same in a data & evidence led company vs one that uses data & evidence.
You can’t go digital, remote or evidence-led by simply copy+pasting what you do now, then chucking in a few tools.
I’ve worked in and with both kinds of organisations. The difference is startling.
I’ve worked in and with both kinds of organisations. The difference is startling.
I’m interested to hear back from folks who’ve made the transition to remote-preferred, digital-native, or data & evidence-led through small, incremental changes.
How did you start? Did you succeed? What was you biggest pitfall?
How did you start? Did you succeed? What was you biggest pitfall?