Read on Twitter
THREAD 
Many will understandably be very concerned about what the the proposed FCO/DFID merger means. Here are some thoughts on it, pointing out a few risks and opportunities. Fundamentally, its success will be dependent on this Government’s commitment to development.
Many will understandably be very concerned about what the the proposed FCO/DFID merger means. Here are some thoughts on it, pointing out a few risks and opportunities. Fundamentally, its success will be dependent on this Government’s commitment to development.
Gov recognises the importance of aid to the UK’s national interests. Central to this is ensuring that aid programmes are implemented effectively and in a way that has maximum impact. Streamlining the functions of the FCO and DFID may be a positive step in ensuring this outcome.
I agree that a joined up foreign policy strategy requires the effective and close coordination of diplomacy, development and defence (and trade). However, we must also ensure we continue spending aid in an effective and transparent way so we don’t damage our reputation overseas.
DFID currently has a tremendous reputation abroad. Our work on development has helped build British influence and earn respect for the UK overseas. And in merging the two departments this should not be overlooked or wasted.
My biggest is concern is losing a voice for development at Cabinet meetings and crucially the National Security Council. This could have huge repercussions for international development and Britain’s soft power.
The Government is right to maintain its 0.7% commitment, meaning that DFID’s great aid programmes will continue. But, the budget will shrink in line with the economy and many difficult decisions will soon need to be made soon on cuts. The merger should not distract from this.
As with any Machine of Government change, the success will turn on the bureaucratic decisions. How will Senior Civil Servants from DFID be brought into the FCO structure? It will be vital that DFID’s expertise is embedded in the Foreign Office at a senior level.
The UK is a Development Super Power thanks to our transparency, effectiveness and accountability in implementing aid programmes. There will be concern that money may be diverted away from alleviating poverty in favour of addressing foreign policy interests. This must be addressed
This is where ICAI, the International Development Select Committee and DAC Rules play an important role.
Also, DFID is a department with exceptional expertise, ranging from education, healthcare, science and economic development. This expertise should not be lost. A strategy should be put in place to avoid a brain drain from the department.
This moment should also be used as an opportunity to streamline the Sustainable Development Goals across Government - especially in the other government departments that spend ODA (often poorly). To do more on Climate Change 
. And is now the time to set up a Development Bank?
. And is now the time to set up a Development Bank?
Finally, our reputation as a Development Super Power will be dependent on Government making clear it remains committed to international development and merging the two departments in a way that DFID’s expertise is properly embedded in the Foreign Office. 
