In 2011 Keir Starmer ran all night courts as Director of Public Prosecutions to maximise the number of people prosecuted after the London riots. https://twitter.com/Keir_Starmer/status/1270374388488167428
Starmer argued that convicting people of riot offences 24-48 hours after they were arrested in magistrates courts would be a deterrent to further unrest.

https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2012/jul/03/riot-prosecutions-sentences-keir-starmer
Some Starmer fans are complaining that he did eventually prosecute Tomlinson's killer PC Simon Harwood in 2011 so pointed to the 2010 decision is somehow unfair. Well the timeline makes it even worse. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-10728685
August 2009: CPS gets a file of evidence against PC Harwood
April 2010: open letter to Starmer about intolerable delays reviewing that evidence.
July 2010: decision taken not to prosecute Harwood.
July 2010: Attorney General Dominic Grieve (a fucking Tory) criticises the CPS decision.

September 2010: pathologist Freddy Patel is suspended from the medical register.

October 2010: Starmer once again declines to prosecute despite Patel's suspension.
Then, after the CPS had delayed for months, taken at least two separate decisions not to prosecute, massive public and even establishment outcry, there was an full inquest into Tomlinson's death, and Starmer finally prosecuted only after that.
Now apply Starmer's arguments for rapid prosecution and sentencing of people arrested for public order offences in the aftermath of the police killing of Mark Duggan, to deter others from joining in, to his massive delays in the case of PC Harwood. https://twitter.com/libcomorg/status/1270639674403495936
You can follow @libcomorg.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.