( THREAD )

This thread is about two basic points :

1. The nationalism of Indian Muslims is just a drama to fool gullible Hindus.

2. Even if a Muslim is truly nationalist, that doesn`t mean any benefit to Hindus.

So start by look at this result of 1946 Provincial Elections.

+
The Muslim League had made this election a referendum on Pakistan, so anyone voting for Muslim League knew it clearly that he was ultimately voting for the formation of an Islamic State Pakistan. Except in North-West Frontier Provinces where ML won seats just less than half

+
of the total seats reserved for Muslims, ML won almost all seats reserved for Muslims and even in NWFP the reason was something else not secularism or patriotism.What`s the implication of this figure ? That almost all Indian Muslims voted for the formation of an Islamic state.

+
Did all of them leave the country ? No, they didn`t, a big number of them stayed in India. Why ? Because why satisfy yourself with Pakistan when you can outbreed Hindus and take whole of India. So all the propaganda of Hindu-Muslim unity propagated by braindead Hindu leaders

+
in the 3 decades preceding partition fell flat on it`s face when a majority of Muslims voted for an Islamic state. For all the supposed unity during Khilafat movement ( which was another Islamic movement, the one for which ISIS fights today ) the Muslims returned the favour to

+
gullible Hindus by voting for Pakistan.And we all know what happened to the Hindu population in Pakistan & Bangladesh after independence. So next time you go to an Iftari party of your beloved nationalist secular Muslim friend do remember that Hindus were treated like animals

+
in Pakistan & Bangladesh because the ancestors of your friend just 3 generations back voted for the formation of Pakistan. All this nationalism drama means nothing when during the actual referendum you show your true colours and vote for an Islamic state.

+
Now coming to the second point, let`s assume for the sake of argument that an average Indian Muslim is very patriotic and maybe even willing to die for this nation. The question I ask is how does it benefit Hindus ? He`s loyal to a state which despite claiming to be secular

+
is more pro-Muslim than pro-Hindu. The state has an entire ministry for their well being, they get numerous schemes and scholarships especially for them, till less than an year ago, they had almost total autonomy over Kashmir, Mosques build after destroying Hindu temples still

+
can`t be legally touched. Even in the Supreme court judgement of Ram Mandir, they get an equivalent land somewhere else. They get 5 acres land after we have already given them two countries for a structure they had illegally captured for centuries. So in such a case even if a

+
Muslim is truly patriotic how does it benefit Hindus ? The state is more concerned about their well-being than ours.
So the nationalism of a Muslim is only but a natural reaction and nothing special or worth celebrating. It`s just being grateful enough.
Conclusion : Indian Muslims` portrayal of being nationalist is just a drama that they will shed when the actual fight for an Islamic state comes and even if they`re being genuinely nationalist then it`s just being grateful enough towards a pro-Muslim state.

Queries are welcome.
Thanks for reading this rather long thread, if you liked this please share this by retweeting or tagging your friends, follow this handle for more such threads and do read all the previous threads.
You can follow @HinduTrad.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.