Read on Twitter
I figured I'd make a thread documenting every single possible case of election fraud, voter suppression, electioneering, and overall shenanigans I can find in the 2016 and 2020 Democratic Primaries. Not in chronological order since it'd take forever.
Here is a very informative report by Election Justice USA. It's 96 pages but I'll talk about a few interesting occurrences. http://www.p2016.org/chrnothp/Democracy_Lost_Update1_EJUSA.pdf
Many cases in EJUSAâs database are supported
by registration records, emails to and from officials, phone records, or affidavit testimony. Available
evidence from Arizona, New York, and California suggests more than 500,000 registrations were
tampered with or improperly handled.
by registration records, emails to and from officials, phone records, or affidavit testimony. Available
evidence from Arizona, New York, and California suggests more than 500,000 registrations were
tampered with or improperly handled.
Based on concrete evidence, Election Justice USA surmises that, unlike Albaâs case, the majority of the
registration tampering could only have been carried out by computer hackers: in many cases, the
changes to voter registrations are provably back-dated in official electronic...
registration tampering could only have been carried out by computer hackers: in many cases, the
changes to voter registrations are provably back-dated in official electronic...
...records. Other forms of
direct voter suppression, however, were carried out by partisan elections officials in states like New
York and California. California. In Brooklyn alone, 121,000 voters were wrongly or even illegally purged from
voter rolls leading up to New York's...
direct voter suppression, however, were carried out by partisan elections officials in states like New
York and California. California. In Brooklyn alone, 121,000 voters were wrongly or even illegally purged from
voter rolls leading up to New York's...
...vote. The Brooklyn voter purge disproportionately affected
Hispanic voters. Analyses in Democracy Lost show that voter purges also disproportionately affected Sandersâ vote totals: the percentage of purged voters for each precinct was a significant predictor of
Clintonâs...
Hispanic voters. Analyses in Democracy Lost show that voter purges also disproportionately affected Sandersâ vote totals: the percentage of purged voters for each precinct was a significant predictor of
Clintonâs...
...vote share. New York Cityâs Board of Elections suspended two high-level employees without
pay but has offered no substantive explanation.
pay but has offered no substantive explanation.
Partisan elections officials also targeted specific classes of voters known to support Senator Sanders. In
California, for instance, six unique methods were employed to systematically disenfranchise âno party
preference" (independent) voters who were legally eligible to vote
California, for instance, six unique methods were employed to systematically disenfranchise âno party
preference" (independent) voters who were legally eligible to vote
EJUSA has also identified irregular
patterns in precinct-level Democratic vote tallies which are strongly suggestive of electronic voting
machine tampering. In all eleven primaries where discrepancies between exit polling and official
results exceeded the margin of error...
patterns in precinct-level Democratic vote tallies which are strongly suggestive of electronic voting
machine tampering. In all eleven primaries where discrepancies between exit polling and official
results exceeded the margin of error...
These discrepancies
occurred primarily in the Democratic Party primaries but not in the Republican primaries. This is remarkable; the exit polls for both parties were conducted on the same day, in the same precincts, with the same interviewers, and used the same methodologies.
occurred primarily in the Democratic Party primaries but not in the Republican primaries. This is remarkable; the exit polls for both parties were conducted on the same day, in the same precincts, with the same interviewers, and used the same methodologies.
This report supplies additional evidence supporting the notion that unverified computer counts
incorrectly tabulated the votes in the Democratic Party primaries. EJUSA analyzed precinct-level
results in the largest counties by population for 35 of 36 Democratic primary states...
incorrectly tabulated the votes in the Democratic Party primaries. EJUSA analyzed precinct-level
results in the largest counties by population for 35 of 36 Democratic primary states...
...(the state of
Arizona does not keep such elections records). These analyses revealed that as precinct size increases,
Clintonâs vote share increases. This pattern holds true even when carefully controlling for demographic
factors such as race and age.
Arizona does not keep such elections records). These analyses revealed that as precinct size increases,
Clintonâs vote share increases. This pattern holds true even when carefully controlling for demographic
factors such as race and age.
This method of analyzing data is based on the Law of Large Numbers. As a sample size grows, its
average rapidly approximates the average of the population being measured. Toss a coin repeatedly,
and, as the number of tosses increase, the increasing sum of the tosses rapidly...
average rapidly approximates the average of the population being measured. Toss a coin repeatedly,
and, as the number of tosses increase, the increasing sum of the tosses rapidly...
...approaches the average
of the two-sided coinâ50% of the tosses average heads or tails. The same principle applies to the election results between candidate Sanders and candidate Clinton. As
the number of votes accumulate for each candidate, their individual vote share should..
of the two-sided coinâ50% of the tosses average heads or tails. The same principle applies to the election results between candidate Sanders and candidate Clinton. As
the number of votes accumulate for each candidate, their individual vote share should..
rapidly approximate their average share of the vote from the entire state. This was not the case in states with
large exit polling discrepancies favoring Clinton, however. Clintonâs vote share rises smoothly
with precinct size raises the strong possibility of voting machine fraud
large exit polling discrepancies favoring Clinton, however. Clintonâs vote share rises smoothly
with precinct size raises the strong possibility of voting machine fraud
EJUSA has established an upper estimate of 184 pledged delegates lost by Sanders due to irregularities & instances of fraud. Adding these to Sandersâ pledged delegate total & subtracting the same number from Hillary's total would more than erase the 359 pledged delegate gap
Chicago's Board of Elections has admitted to one of the authors of the report and to CounterPunch
Magazine that citizens monitoring the audit were right about irregularities in the process and that audit
ânumbers didn't matchâ election day results.
Magazine that citizens monitoring the audit were right about irregularities in the process and that audit
ânumbers didn't matchâ election day results.
In Maricopa County, Arizona, which covers Phoenix and outlying areas, 140 out of 200 polling
locations were eliminated, leaving only one voting center for every 21,000 voters. The countyâs
reduction by 70% of available places to vote, which they claimed was done to save money
locations were eliminated, leaving only one voting center for every 21,000 voters. The countyâs
reduction by 70% of available places to vote, which they claimed was done to save money
An analysis done towards the end of June by public radio station WNYC showed that the purge, which took more than 120,000 voters off the rolls in New York City, had a disproportionate impact on residents with Hispanic surnames https://gothamist.com/news/report-brooklyn-voter-purge-disproportionately-affected-latinos
in Chicago, one person who was part of a group auditing the
election wrote that he saw votes being erased for Bernie Sanders and added for Hillary Clinton in ledgers
as they tallied votes that were being read out loud. https://www.reddit.com/r/SandersForPresident/comments/4nzzn6/election_fraud_study_authors_respond_to_clinton/
election wrote that he saw votes being erased for Bernie Sanders and added for Hillary Clinton in ledgers
as they tallied votes that were being read out loud. https://www.reddit.com/r/SandersForPresident/comments/4nzzn6/election_fraud_study_authors_respond_to_clinton/
Sanders was projected to win Rhode Island by a healthy margin, and leaked e-mails from top DNC staffers reveal knowledge of the outcome of polling site closures in
decreasing Sandersâ vote share while referring to one of the responsible Rhode Island officials as âone of
oursâ
decreasing Sandersâ vote share while referring to one of the responsible Rhode Island officials as âone of
oursâ
Anonymous Report: Was Arizonaâs Voter Registration Data Hacked and Changed? âŚhttps://anonymousinvestigationsblog.wordpress.com/2016/03/26/anonymous-report-was-arizonas-voter-registration-database-hacked/
Ballots With Sanders Votes Covered with White-Out Filmed by Election Monitors in San Diego
Bill Clinton violates election laws by appearing at polling locations http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/2016/03/01/did-bill-clinton-violate-election-rules-venturing-into-polling-location/PH4FIH9jCKYKf6Fzyvfz2N/story.html
NGP VAN DNC Data Breach https://www.politico.com/story/2015/12/bernie-sanders-dnc-data-breach-217016
Electioneering in Pennsylvania! https://twitter.com/avidehTweeting/status/725017012460617728?s=20
Niko House protests voter registration tampering in New York democratic primary
That was all mainly from 2016. Now onto some 2020 shenanigans.
It all started with the Iowa caucus shenanigans.
Bernie loses 300,000 votes in Michigan the matter of 2 minutes. Nothing to see here, folks!
Then there's the infamous exit polls being further off than what we intervene in other countries for...
This was a "test" result of the Illinois democratic primary results a day before the primary actually happened
Speaking of the Illinois primary... Electioneering in Chicago! Facilitated by none other than former Illinois State Senator, Rickey Hendon! No joke!
Here is the State Senator incriminating himself on camera https://twitter.com/Derky_Derk/status/1250728572450295808?s=09
Here we have the Orlando Sentinel showing the Florida democratic primaries being much closer than what they were "finalized" at. Odd coincidence that this repeatedly happens, huh?
This happened in 2016 as well when at least two of my registered democrat friends were switched to independents so they couldn't vote for Bernie in the primary
One of the most obvious cases of election fraud in the 2016 democratic primaries was that of Debbie Wasserman-Schultz & Brenda Snipes against Tim Canova https://www.sun-sentinel.com/local/broward/fl-sb-broward-elections-supervisor-broke-law-snipes-canova-20180514-story.html
Election fraud in Pennsylvania, votes being stolen from Bernie and Tulsi, given to Biden https://twitter.com/AlanMyron/status/1268053895315460101?s=19
Did you know that the Roque "Rocky" De La Fuente had votes stolen from him several states in the 2016 Democratic Primary? Here are the votes stolen from him over time in New Hampshire.
Bernie Sanders had 2,000 - 5,000 votes stolen from him in the 2016 Kentucky Democratic primary.
Roque "Rocky" De La Fuente had 7,000+ votes also stolen from him in Kentucky.
Rocky also had several thousand votes stolen from him in North Carolina. Votes were also stolen from him in Michigan. https://twitter.com/JoinRocky/status/733056074551463936?s=19
