Read on Twitter
** The agenda is not, has never been "recognise ME".
It's always truly been "UNrecognise HER" **
Barraker.
It's always truly been "UNrecognise HER" **
Barraker.
"That female human? Unrecognise her. I want her name, so that I can claim her rights.
That person who created a baby? Unrecognise her. I want her name, so that I can claim her rights."
That person who created a baby? Unrecognise her. I want her name, so that I can claim her rights."
" Nameless people, nameless bodies, nameless lives, nameless functions.
No name means no rights. "
No name means no rights. "
" Only by UNrecognising female people, and unrecognising female biology, can you replace and reassign names and rights to men. "
"So, the half of humanity who are biologically female? Unname them. Reassign the name to those powerful enough to claim it. Let them be nameless.
The people who give birth? Unname them. Reassign the name to those who didn't. Let them be nameless."
The people who give birth? Unname them. Reassign the name to those who didn't. Let them be nameless."
"It's never been about gaining recognition. Noone can recognise the unrecognisable."
"It's about forcing an unrecognition of everything in law that related to female bodies, female people, female functions, …."
" ….so that any and all specifically female rights ascribed expressly because of those female bodies, people, functions, could be claimed by those who do not need them, but very much demand them. "
Barracker's Law
If you can describe it, but can't or mustn't name it, it is vulnerable.
If you can name it, but can't or mustn't describe it, it is powerful.
If you can describe it, but can't or mustn't name it, it is vulnerable.
If you can name it, but can't or mustn't describe it, it is powerful.
