New thread.
There seems to be a collective forgetting among the media when it comes to early coronavirus coverage. I dove down the memoryhole for what happened.
They weren’t raising alarms. No one was. Links & screenshots below, along w/ some thoughts on why not. https://twitter.com/maggieNYT/status/1255175620453113859
There seems to be a collective forgetting among the media when it comes to early coronavirus coverage. I dove down the memoryhole for what happened.
They weren’t raising alarms. No one was. Links & screenshots below, along w/ some thoughts on why not. https://twitter.com/maggieNYT/status/1255175620453113859
To start, @NYTimes on 1/23 begged the question of whether COVID could be as bad as the 2003 SARS outbreak, ending w/ a quote from the US Chamber of Comm in HK Pres saying “it’s too early to panic."
COVID has killed 265x the # of ppl SARS did (& counting) https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/23/world/asia/wuhan-coronavirus-china-economy.html
COVID has killed 265x the # of ppl SARS did (& counting) https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/23/world/asia/wuhan-coronavirus-china-economy.html
Similarly, on 1/21, @CNBC quoted @WHO's advice that a travel ban was unnecessary. They compared the outbreak to SARS, but said that this time "China has moved more rapidly" ending w/ an expert saying "the impact this time should be less than that of SARS" https://www.cnbc.com/2020/01/21/china-coronavirus-what-you-need-to-know-about-the-outbreak-from-wuhan.html
This opening from a 1/24 piece from @latimes staff writer @Emily_Baum speaks for itself, I think. https://www.latimes.com/science/story/2020-01-24/china-coronavirus-panic
Worth pointing out here that our @CDCgov
was taking a similar, muted response, even as more American's displayed concerns, as reported by @MorningConsult on 1/27. https://morningconsult.com/2020/01/27/even-as-cdc-says-risk-of-coronavirus-is-low-in-u-s-worry-begins-to-spread/
was taking a similar, muted response, even as more American's displayed concerns, as reported by @MorningConsult on 1/27. https://morningconsult.com/2020/01/27/even-as-cdc-says-risk-of-coronavirus-is-low-in-u-s-worry-begins-to-spread/
My 2-cents is that this reporting from @RonaldBailey of @reason, also on 1/27, strikes the right note (with normal hindsight caution). It provided the available evidence but hesitated to draw any conclusions more than "we'll see" given the paucity of info. https://reason.com/2020/01/27/how-worried-should-you-be-about-the-wuhan-coronavirus/
Back to the not-so-good. @NPR quoted an expert on 1/25 saying that "[t]he general public should not worry at this time" about coronavirus. This expert compared the outbreak to the seasonal flu: https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2020/01/25/799007842/coronavirus-faqs-do-masks-help-is-the-disease-really-so-mysterious
This sentiment re: seasonal flu v. COVID - which has oft been attributed to conservatives - was broadly common. Here's an example from @LizSzabo, originally for @KHNews but picked up by @USATODAY, @Salon & others, calling season flu "far deadlier": https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2020/01/24/coronavirus-versus-flu-influenza-deadlier-than-wuhan-china-disease/4564133002/
@washingtonpost on 1/27 quoted the head of Columbia University's Center for Infection and Immunity (
@Columbia_CII) W. Ian Lipkin as saying "it is very unlikely that this will ever reach the level that we annually lose to flu." https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/coronavirus-china-latest-updates/2020/01/27/3634db9a-40a7-11ea-aa6a-083d01b3ed18_story.html
@Columbia_CII) W. Ian Lipkin as saying "it is very unlikely that this will ever reach the level that we annually lose to flu." https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/coronavirus-china-latest-updates/2020/01/27/3634db9a-40a7-11ea-aa6a-083d01b3ed18_story.html
Given risk tolerances & uncertainty, the stock market was really the first indicator to get this one right. That isn't a critique of the media - markets are more jittery & swing far more wildly than media coverage should to - but an interesting fact. https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2020/01/why-stock-market-worried-coronavirus.html
By my count, @Slate's coverage was particularly egregious given the lack of info. On 1/24 (updated 1/27) @shanpalus advised that it wasn't time to worry &that the outbreak starting in China was "sort of" random. Not sure how well that'll hold up. https://slate.com/technology/2020/01/coronavirus-outbreak-china-sars-worry-level.html
This reporting from @USATODAY on 1/22 - also w/ comparisons to the seasonal flu - resonates with me as emblematic of coverage at the time.
I'm not saying that, given the circumstances @ the time, this was unreasonable, but far from raising the alarm. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2020/01/22/washington-officials-track-infected-mans-travels-counter-new-virus/4547358002/
I'm not saying that, given the circumstances @ the time, this was unreasonable, but far from raising the alarm. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2020/01/22/washington-officials-track-infected-mans-travels-counter-new-virus/4547358002/
No doubt the media getting this wrong was largely a result of everyone else also getting this wrong. I won't pretend to know enough about the models to know if this conf. level was reasonable, but obv the conclusion was wrong.
Here's Dr. Fauci on 1/26: https://thehill.com/homenews/sunday-talk-shows/479939-government-health-agency-official-corona-virus-isnt-something-the
Here's Dr. Fauci on 1/26: https://thehill.com/homenews/sunday-talk-shows/479939-government-health-agency-official-corona-virus-isnt-something-the
This from @politico also seems well-measured to me, if ultimately inadequate given (what I would call) unforeseeable circumstances for a reporter at the time.
@ddiamond faithfully relays the experts but avoids drawing sweeping conclusions: https://www.politico.com/newsletters/politico-pulse/2020/01/23/is-it-time-to-worry-about-chinese-coronavirus-784593
@ddiamond faithfully relays the experts but avoids drawing sweeping conclusions: https://www.politico.com/newsletters/politico-pulse/2020/01/23/is-it-time-to-worry-about-chinese-coronavirus-784593
There were a lot of opinion pieces that look bad in retrospect. I won't include all of them here, but this one, from @DrMarcSiegel for @thehill on 1/23, is a good example of how well-respected medical professionals missed. Here's the opening line: https://thehill.com/opinion/healthcare/479581-how-worried-should-we-be-about-the-coronavirus
But the most fundamental issue was trusting China. This, from @juliaholli for @CNN, captures the spirit well: praising China for their handling of the virus, learning from the mistakes of SARS, etc. It gives the image of a new, good-global-citizen China.
https://www.cnn.com/2020/01/24/asia/china-sars-coronavirus-intl-hnk/index.html
https://www.cnn.com/2020/01/24/asia/china-sars-coronavirus-intl-hnk/index.html
There's been a lot of this sentiment, early on & since. A few examples:
@USATODAY: https://usatoday.com/story/news/world/2020/04/01/coronavirus-covid-19-china-radical-measures-lockdowns-mass-quarantines/2938374001/
@businessinsider: https://businessinsider.com/chinas-coronavirus-quarantines-other-countries-arent-ready-2020-3
more @CNN: https://cnn.com/2020/03/10/asia/china-coronavirus-propaganda-intl-hnk/index.html
@nature: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-00741-x
@USATODAY: https://usatoday.com/story/news/world/2020/04/01/coronavirus-covid-19-china-radical-measures-lockdowns-mass-quarantines/2938374001/
@businessinsider: https://businessinsider.com/chinas-coronavirus-quarantines-other-countries-arent-ready-2020-3
more @CNN: https://cnn.com/2020/03/10/asia/china-coronavirus-propaganda-intl-hnk/index.html
@nature: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-00741-x
The only problem is that this mentality has been thoroughly debunked by both @WSJ and @axios. China screwed up enormously and lied early on. Too many US outlets took them at face-value.
Links to both are below.
WSJ: https://wsj.com/articles/how-it-all-started-chinas-early-coronavirus-missteps-11583508932
Axios: https://www.axios.com/timeline-the-early-days-of-chinas-coronavirus-outbreak-and-cover-up-ee65211a-afb6-4641-97b8-353718a5faab.html
Links to both are below.
WSJ: https://wsj.com/articles/how-it-all-started-chinas-early-coronavirus-missteps-11583508932
Axios: https://www.axios.com/timeline-the-early-days-of-chinas-coronavirus-outbreak-and-cover-up-ee65211a-afb6-4641-97b8-353718a5faab.html
So I guess my takeaways are:
1) Yes, the media & experts were wrong about COVID in the early aughts
2) Given China's lies & forecasting limitations they may have been reasonably wrong &
3) We must stop trusting Chinese propaganda & infusing journalism w. sweeping conjecture
1) Yes, the media & experts were wrong about COVID in the early aughts
2) Given China's lies & forecasting limitations they may have been reasonably wrong &
3) We must stop trusting Chinese propaganda & infusing journalism w. sweeping conjecture
It wouldn’t be right not to also spotlight how terrible @WHO has handled all of this. I’ve got whole threads dedicated to the subject, but here’s just a few w/ time stamps