They say to me you’re Isl@mophobic. First I used to defend myself but now I don’t. I’ve realised that I’m, in fact, Isl@mophobic. And why shouldn’t I be?

Let’s revisit our history quickly so I can prove my point (A thread)

1. When back in 1100s Mahmud of Ghazni destroys our temples and kills thousands of Hindus and call it a “holy war”. It should be a reason to be isl@mophobic.

2. When in 1200s, Qutb ud din Aibak destroys 20 Hindu and Jain temples and kills 20k Hindus in a single day in the name of “holy god”, it should be a reason to be Isl@mophobic.

3. in 1300s, khilji dynasty “keeps Hindus subjection, in abasement, as a religious duty, because they are the most inveterate enemies of the Prophet”, is a reason to be Isl@mophobic.

4. in 1300s, Khilji dynasty converts non-muslims to Islam or kills them, enslaves them and spoils their wealth and property cuz the Prophet has commanded them to slay them, plunder them, and make them captive (not only in north but in south too), is a reason to be insl@mophobic

5. During 1300s when Malik Kafur massacres Brahmin priests cuz they resisted invasion for 3 days, loots properties of temples, destroys temples and slaughter thousands of other people, It is a reason to be Isl@mophobic.