when COV is all said and done, there will be questions:

how dangerous was the disease?

what was the cost of the things we did to try to stop it?

then we will have to ask: was it worth it?

early data does not make that answer look like "yes" for most of the world
the UK provides a control set. they did not panic into lockdown.

they bet on herd immunity and an end of flu season to attenuate this virus just as it does so many others.

and they look to be winning that bet quite handily.
despite hysterical alleged leaks of being overwhelmed and plague like death rates, instead, it's all been handled so far with little problem save that caused by panic.

"keep calm and carry on" seems to be good advice today just as in the blitz.
meanwhile, the US did everything wrong.

sending every college student home is a percolation model's dream.

well, unless you compare it to telling every american abroad they have 3 days to get home then jamming them in 6 hour lines at customs to cough on each other.
and now we are locking down businesses. the pay for many stops. drivers, waiters, bartenders, factory workers told to stay home, you name it. but mortgages don't stop, nor rent, nor all manner of business costs

the airlines are empty.

the price tag on this is unprecedented.
so, we KNOW the price will be huge. i doubt anyone disagrees about that anymore

but what did we buy? anything?

did we just sell not just the family cow but the family home too for some magic beans so that virtue signalling politicians can look like they are doing something?
this disease spreads best through source infection. pick up food is pretty much just as dangerous as everyone eating out.

yesterday i watched people in ohare airport take off facemasks, touch the chair in terminal C food court to pull it in, then eat a burger.

this is theater
"but experts from john's hopkins said..." well, they said don't close the schools too

like any field, experts disagree

if someone said "an economist said" you'd assume others disagree. so why are we all so willing to pretend that doctors and epidemiologists agree? they don't
calling locking the country down after first setting off the percolation model from hell the "base case" is totally wrong. we never do this. herd immunity is not some speculative idea. it's how we deal with flu and colds every year.

herd immunity working is the base case.
this global panic is very real. panicky humans and the politicians that pander to them are incredibly scary and dangerous

i left PR not for fear of disease, it's barely extant in that latitude

i fled wanda garced and her authoritarian police state lockdown

she's what to fear
PR is on lockdown. the police are out rousting people off an empty beach without another human in 100 yards.

it's already WAY too late. we had a zillion spring breakers in. everyone partied in la placita.

locking them down now is meaningless.

but autocrats gonna autocrat
her actions will harm/kill more puerto ricans than COV will. people can't work. it's a poor island. how are they going to pay rent and feed their families?

this is a nightmare

for every 1% you knock off global GDP, how many millions of human life years do you lose? 45? 70?
those of you trying to account the "human costs" should have heard the fear in my housekeeper's voice about not being able to work and pay bills.

i promised to pay her even while i'm gone because, unlike wanda, i care about what happens to her

everyone will not be so cared for
who's going to pay the bartenders & waiters that work on tips? the uber drivers?

my driver last night from SLC to PC was scared too. this should still be peak season in a ski town. you need to earn now for the dead spot in april/may

he won't be able to. the mountains closed
if we could reduce flu 20% every year, it would save 100,000-120,000 human lives.

but it would probably cost 400 million life years in lost GDP.

that would be a massive human loss.

are you so sure that's not what we're doing here?

did you even ask?
safety is one of those magic words. it makes people shut off the rational parts of their brains

but safety is EXACTLY where we need to be rational

fewer drivers would die if max highway speed was 25mph.

but how many others would die from the economic impact?
when this is all said and done and "leaders" want to claim that their heroic and costly actions saved lives, there needs to be an accounting.

look at the places that did not lock down.

see how they fared.

then count the economic cost and what that cost meant in lives.
the future is uncertain, but my bet is that those pushing lockdown will have caused orders of magnitude more damage than they averted.

perhaps you disagree. perhaps you'll do different math.

fine.

i do not demand that you agree with me, only that you think for real.
do the math. account for cost and benefit in a real way and do not omit the losses in life that stem from economic dislocation and wealth and innovation forgone.

it matters.

because governments WILL try this again.

and when they do, only an informed populace is a bulwark.
before you dismiss this as "gov't knows best" take a look at the track record of central banking as it has tried command/control the business cycle & how that's working out

governments don't suddenly get smart/capable around diseases

they do the same dumb things they always do
and only we can hold them to account and prevent the bloom of such statist desires into the full flowering of authoritarian government meddling with markets and lives and livelihoods.

stay safe.

think well.

make good choices.
You can follow @boriquagato.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.