Thread by @GJosephRoche, It’s February 21, International Mother Language Day. LET’S POLITICIZE THE LANGUAGE OF [...]

It’s February 21, International Mother Language Day.

LET’S POLITICIZE THE LANGUAGE OF LANGUAGE LOSS

/thread/

Do what?

To begin with, you need to know that AT LEAST 50% of

languages are currently facing elimination.

We don’t usually talk about this as a political problem, but we need to.

Since the 1990s, public discussions of this crisis have talked about ‘endangered’ languages, comparing languages to species & global language ‘loss’ to mass extinction. Efforts to intervene in this crisis have mimicked conservation biology.

This approach has been critiqued before, perhaps best by Jane Hill.

But popular discourse & much academic work remains unchanged.

So let’s look at why this approach is problematic, and more importantly, how we can change it.

http://www.rnld.org/sites/default/files/Hill%202002.pdf

This approach has 3 main problems:

Focusing on language erases people & the harm they suffer

it avoids identifying WHO caused the harm &

it doesn’t provide a way to end it.

In this approach:

Languages & diversity DECLINE.

Languages VANISH & are LOST or FORGOTTEN.

Speakers DIMINISH & DWINDLE & are even DEPLETED.

Things happen but nobody does anything. (Except when they save languages)

Nobody gets hurt.

This approach overlooks how languages always ‘decline’ & ‘vanish’ in the context of linguistic discrimination: status subordination, material inequality, social banishment, ethical loneliness & political abandonment.

(

@vocalfries for more on linguistic discrimination)

This approach overlooks how languages always ‘decline’ & ‘vanish’ in the context of linguistic discrimination: status subordination, material inequality, social banishment, ethical loneliness & political abandonment. ( @vocalfries for more on linguistic discrimination)

People suffer. Often their suffering is “ordinary, chronic & cruddy rather than catastrophic, crisis-laden & sublime” (E Povinelli). It is the product of slow violence (R Nixon) across generations.

We must work to bring this very real suffering into view if we want to end it.

We need a new critical lexicon for this. We need to talk about:

language oppression

language elimination

language erasure

language emancipation

linguistic justice

We need to talk about social & political groups DOING THINGS to each other (& for themselves).

Failing to do so not only conceals harms & allows them to continue, but also veils the nature of social & political changes required to stop them. Depoliticized language leads to ineffective resistance.

We need to engage in what @ykomska @mimoyd1 & @Linguacene call ‘linguistic disobedience.’ We need to engage in ‘correction’—to correct ourselves, our peers & especially powerful speakers (like the media)—whenever language oppression is depoliticized.

The only time we shouldn’t do this

is when Indigenous & minoritized people are speaking. They may not always be able to politicize their speech. It may not be safe.

First rule: protect the vulnerable.

But otherwise…

We need to:

Center people

See their suffering

Ask who is causing it?

Stop them

Of course, ‘stopping them’ is the complicated part.

But if depoliticized language prevents us from even getting to that point, then that’s a problem.

My preferred thinking about how we ‘stop them’ is decolonization.

On the personal level, we can follow @ChickashaJenny in seeing efforts to nurture languages as ‘decolonial acts of breath-taking resistance’ that work against eliminatory violence.

http://www.elpublishing.org/docs/1/14/ldd14_03.pdf

On a more systemic level, we can follow @DrJonathanRosa in thinking about decolonization as a project “…informed by a theory of change that is focused on reconstituting or eradicating systems of domination, such as racial capitalism [&] White supremacy…”

And following @tuckeve & K Wayne Yang, we need to realize that decolonization has to be more than an intellectual exercise.

As @nelsonlflores points out, language activism needs to seek material redistribution (substantive, not just symbolic, change)

https://doi.org/10.1515/multi-2017-3045

We can’t decolonize just by saying nice things about oppressed languages.

We also need to critique domination & seek justice. Praise without critique is 'conformist resistance’—e.g. every event in 2019’s Int’l Year of Indigenous Languages (h/t @RokhlK) https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085901363002

In our still-colonial world order, we can’t assume that decolonization will look the same everywhere, because different colonial systems follow different logics. We know a lot about decolonization 4

but less 4

This needs to change.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0031322X.2019.1662074

In our still-colonial world order, we can’t assume that decolonization will look the same everywhere, because different colonial systems follow different logics. We know a lot about decolonization 4 but less 4 This needs to change. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0031322X.2019.1662074

Decolonization 4 linguistic justice needs politicized language.

Let’s interrupt & correct depoliticized speech & make politicized language our mother tongue in preparation 4 the upcoming Int’l decade of Indigenous languages (2022–32)

[quote from Linguistic Disobedience] /fin/

Latest Threads Unrolled: