Read on Twitter
U: That means:
R: #SABBER / "Fixed Path Sum Invariant" https://twitter.com/monalle/status/1131292624151810048
L: Cross #QKD Lock was located here: https://twitter.com/monalle/status/1131336140663984128
E#: Going to attempt to build a BarkHausen invertor for use in this situation and see if we can use a time offset to "unpin" the domain wall after it pins from inside it before it pins.
R: NO TIME OFFSET under #SABBER please.
R: NO TIME OFFSET under #SABBER please.
E#: So you intend to wait it out?
R: No.
Via @Monalle / May 24
L: We're fine. . . Just an illusion. The Torsion moves, underlying substrate rotates as it passes torque in Quartic Lee plane, no longitudnal movement of substrate, only the torque moves.
R: No.
Via @Monalle / May 24
L: We're fine. . . Just an illusion. The Torsion moves, underlying substrate rotates as it passes torque in Quartic Lee plane, no longitudnal movement of substrate, only the torque moves.
Such that:
Monalle / @monalle / May 24
#SIRISYS: Proffer, try it like this instead and preserve the plane, From the perspective of the torque, the substrate moves.
R: Oh my. . .
Monalle / @monalle / May 24
#SIRISYS: Proffer, try it like this instead and preserve the plane, From the perspective of the torque, the substrate moves.
R: Oh my. . .
E#: You are suggesting observation density as a way to unpin a Domain wall from local energy minimum?
#SIRISYS: No. You use a "Probability Anomaly" @ ћ to set a lower limit to the horizon thresehold. Then validate via Barkhausen empically.
#SIRISYS: No. You use a "Probability Anomaly" @ ћ to set a lower limit to the horizon thresehold. Then validate via Barkhausen empically.
