Anyone knows why no one, not even the left, is every talking about the swedish slave trade that happened to start at the same time as Momo?

An empire of mercenaries to the north.
One to the south.
We're only missing the common trading spot
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swedish_slave_trade

Many muslims like to claim they traded with the "vikings", even that vikings were muslims or glorifying alloh. It's true they have a lot in common: both religions come from an older pagan cult, appeared at the same time, had similar "jihad" ideology, ...
/1

they had some sort of system of caste, they were pro-slavery & did benefit greatly from it, etc. They had so many similarities that one could be tempted to believe they were created by the same gang, who adapted each cult to the one already known there.
/2

I'm aware the slave trade in the north was mainly done on other europeans but it's still "surprising" the commies don't use this to score some extra brownie points. They could use it to imply that even whites among themselves enslave each others.
Why not use that card?
/3

This is the trade route map usually shown.

"if so, they may be counted among the precursors to the banks that arose during the late Middle Ages and early modern period."

It's not random that the same claim was stuck on TEMPLiers, founded by "Hugues de Payens" (Hugues the pagan LOL).

I like the deus vult thing but

I have been wondering for a while, before finding about the map above, how the hell could Tenduc be where it is. But now it does make sense seeing the "new roads".

The "Gog and Magog" spot.

https://www.davidrumsey.com/luna/servlet/workspace/handleMediaPlayer?lunaMediaId=RUMSEY~8~1~285388~90058061

https://books.google.ca/books?id=7f9gS40A_3IC&pg=PA242&lpg=PA242&dq=tenduc&source=bl&ots=d0TXlWd3HN&sig=LqEpMYuN3ur7Af9gwj94DQ_RtjM&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwia5-6a3pvbAhUHvlkKHfypBeE4ChDoAQgvMAM#v=onepage&q=tenduc&f=false

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prester_John

mentioned by Marco Polo, who is considered a reliable source in general.
http://archive.is/rCglR 

anyway regarding the TEMPLars, I don't want to disappoint you but they were basically snake oil merchants parading as christians. The rich knights "going to war" & recruiting all the best alpha males of Europe who were under-equipped & were sold or simply died.

Keyword: "sailed" ---> venitians

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Children%27s_Crusade

Chrisians attacking christians and weakening them, in order to be able to take Jerusalem

History is full of bullshit.

NOW LET'S TALK ABOUT VINLAND

Seriously, revisit history through migration routes and resources, & dismiss what are the reasons officially given for wars. And always keep in mind the concept of proxy war when things don't make sense. Many great men or People have been demonized while they were real liberator

An example could be the Mongols & Huns.
They were actually freeing people
You can also look at the nordic dudes who became the Normans; the official story is they invaded France, but it's interesting they actually adopted the language & religion of the place...!

Maybe they were fleeing the horrible "caliphate" of the north...

...considering this, it makes them seem a little bit less "heretic" when you think of what they then did to pagans.

I'm very proud of my celtic ancestors but let's be honest, they were pretty hardcore too with the ISIS type of torture and burning people in cages LOL
At least they're not doing this in 2019. They only kept the cute druidic rituals & St-Jean-Baptiste fire

Anyway.

I have another cool story related to the vikings and slave trade, but it's still a work in progress. Take all this for its entertainment value first.

As many know, Vinland was most likely Quebec. We even found clues in St-Lawrence Valley that they would reach that far.

There also that Irish myth I don't recall the name right now about similar travel and place.

The official story is something like they came here, tried to survive but weather & conflicts with the locals made that "new colony" fail.

The local myths are also worth exploring even though they may have been embelished through time. An example is how the giants are often mentioned by North American Indigenous from different groups that are not always even related linguistically.

I don't have the source & can't remember the word but linguistic too is like living archeology. For example one gang called the settlers something like "white white men", implying they met another group of paler men they originally labelled as "white men" only.

Then there's genetic maps like this.
It shows euro genes within northeast indigenous but NOT at all corresponding to the regions where people actually settled & it's suspected that this might be from before contact.

Note that the north of Great Lakes was difficult to navigate & explore because it was swampy. So even french didn't venture much in that zone for a long time.

Also, the map above is specifically male from europe, mainly R1B (western euro) AFAIK.

(don't worry, it's not a solutrean or white power story haha!)

Then you find the female indigenous genes from that region mainly in Levant.

So white men in America and Indigenous women in Levant/Middle-East. Ok?

:)

(Not a very precise map)

We also know about the old copper mines around the great lakes and Quebec have very very rich content of iron because of all the meteorites that have landed here. Following the trail of minerals & the economy + tech of the period you study is #1. Who owned the mines = power

But one problem is indigenous didn't use copper that much. They did but in a similar way as South American indigenous used gold. They were not doing alloy. Btw, one main reason old world "evolved" more on this is WARS! So that's not a bad thing if indigenous didn't get there ;)

So anyway, article above & others date the mine exploitation to 6k bc, that would have been around the time of the spread of agriculture in Europe & the seafaring technology wouldn't have permitted such travel to America yet.

But take note that it's mentioned they dated the SEDIMENTS & copper tools which span over thousands of years. Also dating is never as precise as we think, especially on short period.

Then there's that gang I found called the Beothuk.

A tribe of indigenous who would have lived around on Newfoundland & maybe on other coasts, a people who lived mainly by the sea in summer and who also had a canoe technology that is unique among indigenous of North America but very close to what Irish used in the old world.

It permitted them to travel at sea.

https://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/settlement/kids/021013-2021.1-e.html

The official story is they were a People who used ochre a lot to cover themselves, lived from the sea in summer then moved into the inland territories in winter for hunting. As euro came around to fish & set on the coats, they were forced to remain inland.

At some point they rebelled, started fighting back & bounties were put on their heads. Mi'kmaq & british started hunting them until they realized they might want to learn more about them. So they found a family, killed the father & kidnapped the mother & daughters.

So we don't have much info on them bc they're almost the only ones who were "interrogated" about the linguistic & myths of their People, and are said to be the last survivors (which is something some Indigenous don't agree with.) Can't trust too much what was collected as data.

So if you put all the above plus the myths together, you could think of a scenario to explain some of this.

I think it might be possible the "vikings" or another People with seafaring technology could have brought white european male slaves to exploit the mines.

They then filled their boats with minerals & kidnapped women, and left the worthless & easily available white slaves there. The ones left there either died or joined tribes that adopted them. Over time, it could make sense these displacements would leave a print on genetic maps.

I could also imagine a bunch of white dudes, associated with the slave traders because of the color of their skin... to cover themselves in red ochre to distinguish from these Old World assholes & not be confused with them by the local indigenous.

I think my story makes way more sense than any dumb thing you often hear and people trying to put themselves in places to fit their own mythology. There's a lot of things similar to this, even with the "Inca" (who btw are not a People but similar to the Windsor, a ruling class)

Do you think so-called anthropologists didn't notice this? Maybe they were lazy or maybe they're not the ones being published. Another massive issue is there's not much multidisciplinary work done on this; everybody re-used the pre-digested conclusions & build their own around it

And unfortunately, many have a bias to fit their own script. Think about the chaos if we would ever discovered that the first humans were actually in South America! That would fuck up a lot of stories. That's a big NO NO.

If what I wrote above is true, it would make sense the people who should take credit for knowing very well America prior to the "official date" would remain silent. Same goes for the different groups of indigenous; yes some invaded the native ones from the south.

If you expose this then there's some lobbies & groups who might lose some billions of reparation money. And then it could lead to a domino effect, as it would with the story above.

I'm not mentioning the details but history IS BULLSHIT & science proves it even if archeology & People are destroyed to erase this.

"90% were killed" Seriously, think about it.

I'll stop there because that would bring me on the topic of the "catholic" church in Spain.

And the missing genes of the conquistadors in south america lal

Start paying attention to unicorns on vintage maps before the official colonies were fully established.

The map I posted before with Tenduc/Gog and Magog... seems like a unicorn is also around that spot.

I think those are symbols like the famous pirate map & it would make sense they would use symbols mixed with others.
https://www.davidrumsey.com/luna/servlet/detail/RUMSEY~8~1~303661~90074314:Composite--Tavola-1-60---Map-of-the;JSESSIONID=62a043d4-3fe9-4522-af2a-c1a7180d5041?qvq=q%3Apub_list_no%3D%2210130.000%22%3Bsort%3APub_List_No_InitialSort%2CPub_Date%2CPub_List_No%2CSeries_No%3Blc%3ARUMSEY%7E8%7E1&sort=Pub_List_No_InitialSort%2CPub_Date%2CPub_List_No%2CSeries_No&mi=0&trs=94

These symbols are usually always in the same spots. I'm pretty sure we could find some too in South America.

Unicorn folks didn't have it easy :)

During the spread of agriculture in Europe, the men also stopped making babies but not their women. "Cultural cause"; I think Otzi gave us clue of what it might have been!

Have anyone ever considered why a People would drink raw milk that made them sick, to a point of genetically developing a resistance to lactose?

How many times was Europe enslaved in the last 10 000 years, and who knows... before?

One symbol for it is the spiral.

Sesostris isn't really well known & is difficult to put in the timeline.
Egyptologists = lobbyists as well.

I thought of a cool epic story of a people like the celts, invaded and enslaved for a long time. Their masters started erecting pillars as a sign of ownership & as we did with the crucifix, the word slav & the deplorable... they adopted the symbol of their pain as their own.

Maybe the pillar still represents ownership today for some, who knows.
We might find clues in myths/old rules. For example, to not put said symbols in lands of your allies. I haven't really explore this yet tbh & obviously you can't trust "Ancient Aliens" & similar distractions

btw, notice that those structures are mainly in places with snow...
I'm amazed no one has figured out it was pretty easy to slide heavy stuff on snow and even stack snow to raise something heavy above something else.
Stars = alignment.

Fuck you ancient aliens.

<--- so sick of the "they believed in an afterlife of blablabla and.... because stupid"

full