Apartheid was nazism. Putting black ppl in homelands was the same as concentration camps. Pass laws were wearing the star of David. Jews stripped of right to certain professions was job reservation act.

The difference? one set of victims were white, the others ARE black.
Just the other day a jaco jumped into my mentions to say apartheid and nazism were two distinct ideologies and man how fucking ignorant.

There was a difference only in method and degree but one lasted 12 years, the other 46. And that’s counting the formal period.
Germany did a denazification project not bec they’re better or smarter but bec it was contingent, in some way, on postwar funding to rebuild society and for the west to ensure it doesn’t remilitarise. Why did the economic powers not demand SA de-apartheidify?
Other than not upsetting the commodities pipeline in the 90s when capitalism was seen to have won, i have to ask whether black bodies matter less to the global powerhouses, that the suffering of black people don’t carry that same weight as other victims.
I know SA is small fry geopolitically and not a threat like Germany was postwar, having played big roles in both world wars. Also America and Britain was fine with apartheid, mostly.

Yet. We needed and still do an intentional denazification project of our own
Ban old flag.
Ban die stem
Make apartheid denialism a crime.
Teach kids about structural oppression.
Teach the history of white exploitation of black people in their own land
Teach the lie of apartheid nationalism and supremacy, the fairytale of inherent superiority
Teach about the paradox of intolerance, how afriforum and the DA rewriting reality about “all forms of racism” being the bullshit it is. Bec I am fucking sick and tired of circling this fucking same messy white created cesspit drain of “race debate”

And that’s just the start.
paradox of tolerance*
"As early as 1945, the Non-European Unity Movement drew up a document that informed the United Nations of the similarities between the South African race laws and Nazism.”
covers of 1964 book by anti-apartheid activist. The Rise of the South African Reich
French anti apartheid poster comparing Vorster with Hitler
A rally in Nuremberg? Nope, the Ossewabrandwag in South Africa in support of Hitler. They formed in 1939, admired Hitler and nazi Germany, tried to get SA to fight alongside Germany
SA Nazi Party “gryshemde” or Greyshirts, styled to fit the apartheid coloured or orange, blue and white
SA Nazi Party mouthpiece “The Truth” newspaper with a swastika on the masthead
The OB was reported to have conducted espionage for Nazi germany. It’s members included Vorster and P.W. Botha. Both became apartheid prime ministers
Since this thread is getting attention any second now someone is gonna say I’m anti Semitic. Listen. No. This is not about the Holocaust. This is about racial superiority policies that were similar in content and implementation in the nazi and apartheid regime.
And while scholars acknowledge similarities they point to differences like the nazi killing existing on a horrific mechanized scale. But I’m not interested in ranking the Holocaust vs colonialist apartheid SA.
What I AM pointing out, again, is that the world came together to defeat nazism and while that was happening nazi SAns were mobilizing to form legal apartheid in 48. And the world just carried on. Just 3 years after 45, welp, it’s fine, we’ll let that racist state be
https://twitter.com/spookyayesha/status/1033045332182093824?s=21
You can follow @aysshie.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.