#Unconstitutional

Elie Honig

eliehonig

Still lots of concern about what happens on January 6, given the recent conduct of President Trump and many in the House and Senate. Bottom line: It'll be a ridiculous

Steve Vladeck

steve_vladeck

1. Thanks to MyPillow guy (sigh), here's, hopefully for the last forking time, one more #thread on the Insurrection Act — and why there's neither a legal nor practical pathway

Christine Van Geyn

cvangeyn

I am trying to figure out the basis on which Elections Ontario says there was a violation of their (unconstitutional) third party advertising laws. Some tweets to follow. #onpoli https://twitter.com/TorontoStar/status/1275953112646397958

Elie Honig

eliehonig

I'm still seeing a lot of concern about the Texas Supreme Court filing, which is understandable. From a certain angle, it looks imposing. So here, in sum, is why there's

Jonathan Peters

jonathanwpeters

(1/x) Coverage of the effort to prevent distribution of Bolton's book should note Trump's remarkable record of attempting to interfere with speech/press activities -- and either failing or not following through.

TimKarr

TimKarr

Now might be a good time to mention that William Barr spent much of his career helping monopoly-minded phone and cable companies eliminate local competition and take control of broadband

alex

KorraLarson

ALL THE HORRIBLE THINGS DONALD TRUMP HAS DONE FOR BLACK, INDIGENOUS, & PEOPLE OF COLOR ~ a thread (debunking all of the things Trump has “claimed” he’s done too) Okay

Alonso Gurmendi

Alonso_GD

So, what is going on in Peru? A few months ago, there was a minor political scandal involving fake contracts for a singer hired by the Ministry of Culture. Vizcarra's

Inxsy Sparks

InxsySparks

It alleges that “a cabal of state and local executives have partnered with private interests” to undermine the integrity of the election. The 116-page complaint—which essentially challenges the constitutionality of

Lyman Stone 石來民

lymanstoneky

Hmmm....You might be able to hit a handful with this. But the precedent from e.g the "Crittenden Compromise" is that even flagrantly unconstitutional legislative votes deeply hostile to the union

Shawn Wenzel

shawnwenzel

While we are talking about abortion law in Jamaica it's worth looking at what happened in Canada: Parliament never passed a law legalizing abortion, and yet abortion is completely legal

Muiz Banire

Mbanire

Distinguished readers, you are welcome to today’s episode of our #LeadershipTalks. I am addressing events unfolding as the aftermath of the #Endsars protests. The issues that led to the

ClearingTheFog

clearing_fog

Texas (Ken Paxton) just sued PA, GA, WI, and MI in the Supreme Court over 'unlawful election results' in 2020 presidential raceMAGA is going crazy over this, believing that this

BBC News (World)

BBCWorld

Ethiopia's federal government has vowed to continue a military offensive in the Tigray region despite international calls for restraintTensions have come to a head with some fearing civil warSo how

⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️President-Elect AfroCon

kdlewis04

Quick history thread by Paralegal Afro. All roads lead to Georgia. An arrogant state. States primarily have sovereign immunity. Art 3 allowed federal courts to hear disputes between a state

Jaideep Reddy

jrtechlaw

On the news of a potential ban of cryptocurrency in India:1. Let's wait for the text of the Bill. It's not clear that it will be the same as the

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.